Creative incubator model as a catalyst agent to dynamize the creative ecosystem in a cultural city
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2022.1079Keywords:
Ceative ecosystem, Creative entrepreneurship, Creative incubator, Cultural and creative industriesAbstract
Objetive. The research aims to discover the most critical factors that must be considered when building a creative incubator model to generate value for artists, arts organizations, entrepreneurs, and creative companies by providing direct and indirect services within a creative ecosystem and cultural communities. The study seeks to document and support the role that creative incubators play in accelerating the development of the creative ecosystem within a cultural city. Also, highlight the importance of its location and the use of a platform based on creative ideas, innovation, and technology, considering the incubator as a critical actor within the creative ecosystem network.
Method. Following the objectives defined for this study, a qualitative and descriptive investigation was chosen. For the research, the adaptive planning cycles and the action research design have been selected as methodology.
Conclusion. The proper implementation of the "creative incubator" can provide more significant business opportunities, envisioning an articulation with the private and public sectors, seeking to integrate with other public policies that generate development through, for example, the Agency for Innovation and Entrepreneurship of the Region. The integration of these actors will make it possible to value the cultural diversity, knowledge, and practices of citizens, thus enabling sustainable development. In this way, the academy can contribute to improving the lives of citizens, promoting projects and initiatives that improve living conditions and the integration of creative entrepreneurs.
References
Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future: A System Approach to Societal Problems. New York: Willey – Interscience. Open Journal of Optimization, 05(01), 22-30.
AL-Mubaraki, H., & Busler, M. (2014). Incubator successes: Lessons learned from successful incubators towards the twenty-first century. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 11(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-08-2013-0030
Alzaghal, Q. K., & Mukhtar, M. (2017). Factors Affecting The Success of Incubators and The Moderating Role of Information and Communication Technologies. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(2), 538-545. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.2.1678
ANPROTEC. (2012). Estudo, Análise e Proposições sobre as Incubadoras de Empresas no Brasil. Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação. Anprotec. https://anprotec.org.br/site/publicacoes-anprotec/estudos-e-pesquisas/
Astebro, T., Bazzazian, N., & Braguinsky, S. (2012). Startups by recent university graduates and their faculty: Implications for university entrepreneurship policy. Research Policy, 41(4), 663-677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.004
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1994). Investigação qualitativa em educação: Uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto Editora. https://ria.ufrn.br/jspui//handle/123456789/1119
Caetano, D. (2012). Empreendedorismo e Incubação de Empresas.
Carayannis, E., & von Zedtwitz, M. (2005). Architecting gloCal (global-local), real-virtual incubator networks (G-RVINs) as catalysts and accelerators of entrepreneurship in transitioning and developing economies: Lessons learned and best practices from current development and business incubation practices. Technovation, 25, 95-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(03)00072-5
CERNE. (2018). Qualificando Ambientes de Inovação. Centro de Referência para Apoio a Novos Empreendimentos – Cerne. Sumario Executivo Cerne. Anprotec. https://anprotec.org.br/site/publicacoes-anprotec/livros/
Corrales, Martha. (2019, mayo 8). TecFounders como catalizador del ecosistema de emprendimiento. EGADE. https://egade.tec.mx/es/egade-ideas/opinion/tecfounders-como-catalizador-del-ecosistema-de-emprendimiento
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research.
EBN. (2013). EC-BIC Observatory 2013. Kipdf.Com. https://kipdf.com/ec-bic-observatory-2013_5adb7ed87f8b9a841e8b4616.html
ECIA. (2020). CONNECTING WITH EFFICIENT PRACTICES ACROSS EUROPE CLUSTER 2020 REPORT | WP2 – Efficient & Sustainable Businesses within an Efficient Cluster—Buscar con Google.
Essig, L. (2014). Arts Incubators: A Typology. The Journal of Arts Management Law and Society, 44, 169-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10632921.2014.936076
Essig, L. (2018). Value Creation by and Evaluation of US Arts Incubators. International Journal of Arts Management, 20, 32-46.
Etmanowicz, A. (2017, March 15). Creative Incubator—A Fancy Thing to Do? Aspen Institute Central Eu rope. https://www.aspen.review/article/2017/creative-incubator-a-fancy-thing-to-do%3f/
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
Franco, M., Haase, H., & Correia, S. (2018). Exploring Factors in the Success of Creative Incubators: A Cultural Entrepreneurship Perspective. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0338-4
Gerl, E. (2000). Bricks and Mortar: Renovating or Building a Business Incubation Facility. National Business Incubation Association.
González, M. D. (1997). Procesos de planeamiento e integracao dos plos tecnológicos e de modernizacao. Revista de ciencia e tecnología -Recitec ,Recife,VOL.1, N 1,JAN./DEZ. CV PUCP.
González, M. D. (2017). Desarrollo de las Incubadoras de Empresas en el Perú y Políticas Públicas de Promoción: Un caso de estudio—Buscar con Google.
González, M. D., & Melo, M. A. C. (2004). Planificación interoganizacional y desarrollo emprendedor: Un estudio de caso. In Anais da III Conferencia Internacional de Pesquisa em Emprendedorismo na América Latina (CIPEAL), Río de Janeiro.
Gozali, L., Masrom, M., Haron, H., Yuri, T., & Zagloel, Y. (2015). A Framework of Successful E-Business Incubator for Indonesian Public Universities. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1279.8965
Harrington, D. M. (1990). The ecology of human creativity: A psychological perspective. Based on a colloquium," Toward a Psychology of Creative Environments: An Ecological Perspective," presented at the Institute of Personality Assessment and Research, University of California, Berkeley, Sep 1984.
Harrington, D. M. (1999). Conditions and settings/environment. Encyclopedia of creativity, 1, 403-412.
Jackson, W. T., Scott, D. J., & Schwagler, N. (2015). Using the Business Model Canvas as a Methods Approach to Teaching Entrepreneurial Finance. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education. https://www.scinapse.io
Jaurová, Z. & Jenčíková, K. & Inkei, P. & Hentz, J. & Rolník, J & Mixová, M. & Žáková, E. & Etmanowicz, A. (2018). V4 – Creative Incubators – Guide to places and spaces of creative incubation in Central Europe – PROSPERO. https://prospero.idu.cz/en/publikace/v4-creative-incubators-guide-to-places-and-spaces-of-creative-incubation-in-central-europe/
Jurkowitsch, S. (2007). A strategic concept for an academic business incubation programme with the support of project management tools. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 4(2), 138. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2007.011841
Kantis, H. (2017). Entendiendo a las incubadoras desde un enfoque sistémico organizacional. https://prodem.ungs.edu.ar/publicaciones_prodem/evaluacion-de-incubadoras-de-emprendimientos-el-caso-uruguayo-y-su-comparacion-con-el-benchmark-chileno/
Kantis, H., Federico, J., & Menéndez, C. (2017). Evaluación de incubadoras de emprendimientos: El caso uruguayo y su comparación con el benchmark chileno. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/spanish/document/Evaluaci%C3%B3n-de-incubadoras-de-emprendimientos-El-caso-uruguayo-y-su-comparaci%C3%B3n-con-el-benchmark-chileno.pdf
Kong, L. (2009). Beyond Networks and Relations: Towards Rethinking Creative Cluster Theory. Creative Economies, Creative Cities: Asian-European Perspectives, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9949-6_5
Lalkaka, R. (2000). Manual on technology business incubators—UNESCO Biblioteca Digital. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000144276
Lobosco, A., Costa, P. R. D., Almeida, M. R. D., & Maccari, E. A. (2015). La Aplicabilidad del Modelo de Negocios en Incubadoras de Empresas de Base Tecnológica para su Autosostenibilidad: Un estudio de incubadoras portuguesas. Revista Alcance, 22(4), 490-517.
Markman, G., Phan, P., Balkin, D., & Gianiodis, P. (2005). Entrepreneurship and University-Based Technology Transfer. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 241-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.12.003
Martínez, M. (2006). La investigación cualitativa etnográfica en educación. Manual teórico -práctico. Educere, 10(35), 757-758.
MCT. (2000). Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología—Secretaría de Política Tecnológica Empresarial – Manual para la implementación de incubadoras de empresas. MCT - MINISTERIO DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA. Innovación tecnológica y transferencia de tecnología. Brasilia: Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología, 2001a. 38p. https://www.gov.br/mcti/pt-br
Melo, M. A. C. (1982). Sistema de Planejamento, Pesquisa e Ação. São Paulo, Ciência e Cultura, v. 34, n. 8, p. 1026-1031. Escavador. https://www.escavador.com/sobre/5274645/maria-angela-campelo-de-melo
Negrão, C.E. (2003). The Incubation Process. Scribd. https://www.scribd.com/document/123212360/The-Incubation-Process-September-2003
NODRIZA. (2005). Guia de Buenas Practicas. Incubadoras de empresas. https://docplayer.es/18977746-Guia-de-buenas-practicas-incubadoras-de-empresas.html
Ranga, M., & Etzkowitz, H. (2013). Triple Helix Systems: An Analytical Framework for Innovation Policy and Practice in the Knowledge Society. Industry and Higher Education, 27(4), 237-262. https://doi.org/10.5367/ihe.2013.0165
ReINC. (2001). Modelo de Gestión para Incubadoras de Empresas: Un Marco de Indicadores de Desempeño. Río de Janeiro. https://reinc.org.br/
Rodriguez, A., & Ojeda, E. (2013). El modelo de negocio: La lógica para hacer dinero y crear valor. http://virtual.iesa.edu.ve/servicios/wordpress/?p=2646
SEBRAE–SP. (2010). Programa SEBRAE-SP de incubadoras de empresas—Manual de procedimentos. Cartilha. https://www.oitcinterfor.org/experiencia/programa-incubadoras-empresas-del-sebrae-brasil
Simmie, J. (2004). Innovation and Clustering in the Globalised International Economy. Urban Studies, 41(5-6), 1095-1112. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980410001675823
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative Case Studies. In The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed (pp. 443-466). Sage Publications Ltd.
Tomaz, E., Selada, C., & Cunha, I. V. da. (2011). Creative-based strategies in small and medium-sized cities: Some European study cases. En ERSA conference papers (ersa11p893; ERSA Conference Papers). European Regional Science Association. https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa11p893.html
UNIDO. (2014). The creative ecosystem: Facilitating the development of creative industries. https://www.unido.org/publications/creative-ecosystem-facilitating-development-creative-industriespdf
Verma, S. (2004). Success factors for business incubators: An empirical study of Canadian business incubators [Text, Carleton University]. https://curve.carleton.ca/3e53ae0a-1536-47fe-bf15-61801227cbdf
Wood, S., & Dovey, K. (2015). Creative Multiplicities: Urban Morphologies of Creative Clustering. Journal of Urban Design, 20(1), 52-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2014.972346
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. The Canadian Journal of Action Research, 14(1), 69-71.
__
Received Recibido-Recibido: 2021-12-08
Accepted-Aceptado-Aceitado: 2022-12-09
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
