Evaluation of Open Government Data portals
a literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2025.1334Keywords:
Open government data, Information retrieval, AssessmentAbstract
Objective. The research aims to identify academic production on the evaluation of Open Government Data portals and the methodologies employed. Method. Descriptive and exploratory research, with bibliographic research and literature review procedures, with a protocol containing the selection of search databases; eligibility, inclusion and exclusion criteria; and search, selection, analysis and processing expressions. For the analysis and discussion of the final sample, Bardin's (2016) content analysis technique was used, which supported the definition of categories for analysis. The collection, analysis and selection procedures were carried out between June and November 2024, through the federated access of the authors' institution, on the CAPES Journals Portal, with the open access filter. Results. An amount of 64 papers, published from 2013 to 2024, were identified, with a prevalence in the areas of Computer Science and Information Science. This sample represented all continents, with emphasis on Latin America and Europe. There was heterogeneity in the evaluation methods among the 64 studies analysed. Therefore, the studies were categorized by predominant characteristics in the origin of the methodology used. Conclusions. It was observed that most of the studies used their own methodology. This variety may be justified by the need to reflect specificities of the portals evaluated, or different interests of the audiences covered by the studies, such as users with low literacy in the use of data. It is worth noting that the studies retrieved indicated limitations in information retrieval mechanisms and semantic technologies.
References
Aarshi, S., Tariq, U., Hayat, B., Habib, F., Ashfaq, K., & Saleem, I. (2018). Dimensions of Open Government Data web portals: A case of Asian countries. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 9(6). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2018.090663
Abella, A., Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., & De-Pablos-Heredero, C. (2022). Criteria for the identification of ineffective open data portals: Pretender open data portals. El Profesional de la información, Artículo e310111. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.ene.11
Alexopoulos, C., Loukis, E., Mouzakitis, S., Petychakis, M., & Charalabidis, Y. (2018). Analysing the characteristics of Open Government Data sources in Greece. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 9(3), 721–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0298-8
Afful-Dadzie, E., & Afful-Dadzie, A. (2017). Open Government Data in Africa: A preference elicitation analysis of media practitioners. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 244-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.005
Ali, M., Papageorgiou, G., Aziz, A., Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., & Lopez Pellicer, F. J. (2024, June 11-14). Towards the development of interoperable Open Data Ecosystems: Harnessing the Technical, Semantic, Legal, and Organizational (TSLO) interoperability framework. In 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research [Conference]. Taipei, Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657160
Aló, C. C. (2009). Uma abordagem para transparência em processos organizacionais utilizando aspectos. [Tese de doutorado, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro]. PUC-Rio, Departamento de Informática. https://www-di.inf.puc-rio.br/~julio/tese-cappelli.pdf
Alogaiel, N. F., & Alrwais, O. A. (2023). An assessment of the quality of Open Government Data in Saudi Arabia. IEEE Access, 11, 61560–61599. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3285611
Amorim, André Luiz Guimarães; Nascimento Silva, Patrícia (2025). Revisão de literatura: Avaliação de portais de Dados Governamentais Abertos. Mendeley Data, V1. http://doi.org/10.17632/hwtxhxrf95.1
Andrade, M. C., Cunha, R. O. D., Figueiredo, J., & Baptista, A. A. (2021). Do the European Data Portal Datasets in the categories government and public sector, transport and education, culture and sport meet the data on the web best practices? Data, 6(8), 94. https://doi.org/10.3390/data6080094
Arquero Avilés, R., & Marco Cuenca, G. (2014). El Portal de datos abiertos de la Unión Europea: Análisis y evaluación. Revista General de Información y Documentación, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_RGID.2014.v24.n1.45384
Bardin, L. (2016). Análise de conteúdo. Edições 70.
Bello, O., Akinwande, V., Oluwatoyosi, J., Ahmed, I. (2016). Open data portals in Africa: An analysis of open government data initiatives. African Journal of Library, Archives & Information Science, 26(2), 97–106. https://home.victorakinwande.com/files/pdfs/bello-open-data-portals.pdf
Berners-Lee, T. (2012). 5 estrelas dos dados abertos. 5 Star Data. https://5stardata.info/pt-BR/
Bittencourt, C. A. (2019). Analysis of Open Government Data initiatives in Brazil [Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Europeia]. Repositório Comum. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.26/29768
Borko, H. (1968). Information science: What is it? American Documentation, 19(1), 3–5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.5090190103
Bouchelouche, K., Ghomari, A. R., & Zemmouchi-Ghomari, L. (2022, November 29-30). Enhanced analysis of open government data: Proposed metrics for improving data quality assessment. In 5th International Symposium on Informatics and its Applications (ISIA) [Symposium]. M'sila, Algeria. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISIA55826.2022.9993482
Braga, J. V., & Gouveia, F. A. R. (2022). Iniciativas brasileiras para Dados Governamentais Abertos Conectados: Uma análise do nível de abertura dos dados nas plataformas governamentais brasileiras. Revista Ibero-Americana de Ciência da Informação, 15(2), 495–515. https://doi.org/10.26512/rici.v15.n2.2022.42801
Braman, S. (2011). Defining information policy. Journal of Information Policy, 1, 1–5.
Brasil (2016). Decreto nº 8.777, de 11 de maio de 2016. Institui a Política de Dados Abertos do Poder Executivo Federal. Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/decreto/d8777.htm
Brasil. (2000). Lei Complementar nº 101, de 4 de maio de 2000: Estabelece normas de finanças públicas voltadas para a responsabilidade na gestão fiscal e dá outras providências. Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/lcp/lcp101.htm
Brasil. (2011). Lei nº 12.527 de 18 de novembro de 2011: Regula o acesso a informações previsto no inciso XXXIII do art. 5º... Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htm
Brasil. (2021). Lei nº 14.129, de 29 de março de 2021: Dispõe sobre princípios, regras e instrumentos para o Governo Digital... Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2019-2022/2021/lei/l14129.htm
Brasil (2023). Parceria para Governo Aberto - OGP. Controladoria Geral da União. https://www.gov.br/cgu/pt-br/governo-aberto/a-ogp
Cadena-Vela, S., Fuster-Guilló, Á., & Mazón, J. N. (2019). Publicando datos abiertos considerando criterios de calidad. Revista Ibérica de Sistemas e Tecnologias de Informação, Artigo E22. https://rua.ua.es/dspace/bitstream/10045/99755/1/2019_Cadena-Vela_etal_RISTI.pdf
Cervantes, B. M. N., Ramalho, R. A. S., Gonçalez, P. R. V. A., & Santos, J. C. F. dos. (2018). Representação e recuperação da informação na web: Aspectos teóricos e tecnológicos. Pesquisa Brasileira em Ciência da Informação e Biblioteconomia, 13(2). https://www.pbcib.com/index.php/pbcib/article/view/43235
Chatfield, A. T., & Reddick, C. G. (2017). A longitudinal cross-sector analysis of open data portal service capability: The case of Australian local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 231–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.02.004
Chokki, A. P., Clarinval, A., Simonofski, A., Vanderose, B. (2023, August 10-12). Evaluating a conversational agent for open government data quality assessment. In AMCIS 2023: Proceedings of the 29th Americas Conference on Information Systems [Conference]. Panama City, Panama. https://researchportal.unamur.be/en/publications/evaluating-a-conversational-agent-for-open-government-data-qualit
Barni, G. A. C., Moro, M. F., Bornia, A. C., & Tezza, R. (2022). Visibilidade dos dados nos portais de dados governamentais abertos da América Latina. Innovar, 32(85), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar.v32n85.101127
Corrêa, A. Sh., Paula, E. C. D., Corrêa, P. L. P., & Silva, F. S. C. D. (2017). Transparency and open government data: A wide national assessment of data openness in Brazilian local governments. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 11(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-12-2015-0052
Curto-Rodríguez, R. (2020). Transparencia operativa de las comunidades autónomas españolas mediante sus portales de datos abiertos. El Profesional de la Información, 29(1). Artículo e290115. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.ene.15
Curto-Rodríguez, R. (2021). Análisis multidimensional de los portales de datos abiertos autonómicos españoles. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 44(1), Artigo e284. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2021.1.1745
Eaves, D. (2009). The three laws of open government data. Eaves. https://eaves.ca/2009/09/30/three-law-of-open-government-data/
Elsawy, E., & Shehata, A. (2023). Open government data initiatives in the Maghreb countries: An empirical analysis. IFLA Journal, 49(1), 61–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352221104847
Francey, A., & Mettler, T. (2022, December 9-14). Satisfaction with open government data portals: A user-centric configurational perspective. In 43rd International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2022) [Conference]. Copenhagen, Denmark. https://serval.unil.ch/resource/serval:BIB_AE2AC43C14AF.P001/REF
Galvão, M. C. B., & Ricarte, I. L. M. (2020). Revisão sistemática da literatura: Conceituação, produção e publicação. Logeion - Filosofia da Informação, 6(1), 57–73. http://revista.ibict.br/fiinf/article/view/4835
Gil, A. C. (2017). Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa (6ª ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.
Hafidz, I., Adzanni, G. A., & Aini Rakhmawati, N. (2023, November 2-4). Open Data Portal Quality (ODPQ) framework based metric for assessing the quality of Open Data Portals in Indonesian local governments. In International Conference on Smart-Green Technology in Electrical and Information Systems (ICSGTEIS) [Conference]. Badung, Bali, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSGTEIS60500.2023.10424389
Herrera-Melo, C. A., & González-Sanabria, J. S. (2019). Proposal for the evaluation of Open Data Portals. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería, 29(54), Article e10194. https://doi.org/10.19053/01211129.v29.n0.2020.10194
Hitzler, P., Krotzsch, M., & Rudolph, S. (2009). Foundations of semantic web technologies. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
Hwang, C., Yoon, K. (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Hwang, C.; Yoon, K. (Eds.). Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications: A state-of-the-art survey (pp. 58-191). Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Iamamphai, P., Noymanee, J., San-Um, W., & Pasupa, K. (2016, October 12-14). Investigations and comparisons of government open data websites through systematic functional analysis and efficient promotion approach. In Management and Innovation Technology International Conference (MITicon), MIT-142-MIT-147 [Conference]. Bang-San, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITICON.2016.8025229
Isotani, S., & Bittencourt, I. I. (2015). Dados abertos conectados. São Paulo, SP: Novatec Editora. https://ceweb.br/livros/dados-abertos-conectados/
Klein, R. H., Klein, D. C. B., & Luciano, E. M. (2018). Identificação de mecanismos para a ampliação da transparência em portais de dados abertos: Uma análise no contexto brasileiro. Cadernos EBAPE.BR, 16(4), 692–715. https://doi.org/10.1590/1679-395173241
Kozievitch, N. P., Fonseca, K. V. O., Rosa, M. D. O., Berardi, R., Gutierrez, M. B., Belizario, M., Luz, M. G., & Liu, E. (2022, September 26-29). Assessment of Open Data Portals: A Brazilian case study. In IEEE International Smart Cities Conference (ISC2) [Conference]. Pafos, Cyprus. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISC255366.2022.9921914
Kubler, S., Robert, J., Le Traon, Y., Umbrich, J., & Neumaier, S. (2016, June 8-10). Open Data Portal quality comparison using AHP. In 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research [Conference]. Shanghai, China. https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912167
Lnénicka, M., Máchová, R., Volejníková, J., Linhartová, V., Knezackova, R., & Hub, M. (2021). Enhancing transparency through open government data: The case of data portals and their features and capabilities. Online Information Review, 45(6), 1021–1038. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-05-2020-0204
Lóscio, B. F., Guimarães, C. B. dos S., & Calegari, N. (2016). Boas práticas para dados na web: Desafios e benefícios. Revista Principia, 1(32), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.18265/1517-03062015v1n32p9-18
Lourenço, R. P. (2013). Open Government Portals assessment: A transparency for accountability perspective. In M. A. Wimmer, M. Janssen, & H. J. Scholl (Orgs.), Electronic Government (Vol. 8074, pp. 62–74). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40358-3_6
Lourenço, R. P. (2015). An analysis of open government portals: A perspective of transparency for accountability. Government Information Quarterly, 32(3), 323–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.05.006
Máchová, R., Hub, M., & Lnénicka, M. (2018). Usability evaluation of open data portals: Evaluating data discoverability, accessibility, and reusability from a stakeholders' perspective. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 70, 252-268. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2018-0026
Máchová, R., & Lnénicka, M. (2017). Evaluating the quality of Open Data Portals on the national level. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 12(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762017000100003
Martínez, R., Rodriguez, R., & Vera, P. (2020, December 1-4). Analysis of datasets and catalogs in government open portals of the Argentine Republic. In IEEE Congreso Bienal de Argentina (ARGENCON) [Congreso]. Resistencia, Argentina https://doi.org/10.1109/ARGENCON49523.2020.9505371
Miletić, A., Kuveždić Divjak, A., & Welle Donker, F. (2023). Assessment of the Croatian Open Data Portal using user-oriented metrics. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 12(5), 185. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi12050185
Milić, P., Veljković, N., & Stoimenov, L. (2022). Using OpenGovB Transparency Indicator to evaluate National Open Government Data. Sustainability, 14(3), 1407. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031407
Molodtsov, F., & Nikiforova, A. (2024, June 11-14). An integrated usability framework for evaluating Open Government Data Portals: Comparative analysis of EU and GCC countries. In 25th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research [Conference]. Taipei, Taiwan. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657159
Moradi, M., Mazoochi, M., & Ahmadi, M. (2022). A comprehensive method for improving the quality of Open Government Data and increasing citizens: Willingness to use data by analyzing the complex system of citizens and organizations. Complexity, 2022(1), Article 5876035. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5876035
Musa, A., & Ðurman, P. (2023, May 22-26). Status of Open Data (Sub)Ecosystem in Croatia: National Open Data Portal. In 46th MIPRO ICT and Electronics Convention (MIPRO) [Convention]. Opatija, Croatia. https://doi.org/10.23919/MIPRO57284.2023.10159782
Nascimento Silva, P. (2023). Observatório de dados governamentais abertos: Acesso às APIs brasileiras. Revista ACB, 28(1). https://revistaacb.emnuvens.com.br/racb/article/view/2049
Nascimento Silva, P. (2024). Recuperação de dados abertos para inovação cívica e ciência cidadã: Uma análise do novo portal brasileiro. AtoZ: novas práticas em informação e conhecimento, 13, 1. https://doi.org/10.5380/atoz.v13i0.89352
Nascimento Silva, P. & Pinheiro, M. M. K. (2017, Outubro 23-27). Métricas para dados governamentais abertos: análise de modelos internacionais. In XVIII Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (ENANCIB) [Encontro]. Marília, São Paulo. https://brapci.inf.br/index.php/res/download/124920
Nascimento Silva, P., & Pinheiro, M. M. K. (2018, December 28). DGABr: Metric for evaluating Brazilian open government data. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2018v28n3.42183
Neumaier, S., Umbrich, J., & Polleres, A. (2016). Automated quality assessment of metadata across Open Data Portals. Journal of Data and Information Quality, 8(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/2964909
Nicolás, M. A., & Mamani Catachura, C. (2020). Gobierno abierto: Análisis de websites de datos abiertos gubernamentales en Argentina, Brasil y Paraguay. Desenvolvimento em Debate, 8(1), 163–193. https://doi.org/10.51861/ded.dmv.1.013
Nikiforova, A. (2020a, July 23-25). Assessment of the usability of Latvia’s Open Data Portal or how close are we to gaining benefits from Open Data. In 14th International Conference on Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction 2020 and 13 Th International Conference on Game and Entertainment Technologies 2020 [Conference]. https://doi.org/10.33965/ihci_get2020_202010L007
Nikiforova, A. (2020b, July 21-23). Comparative analysis of national Open Data Portals or whether your portal is ready to bring benefits from open data. In International Conferences on ICT, Society and Human Beings (ICT 2020), Connected Smart Cities (CSC 2020) and Web Based Communities and Social Media (WBC 2020) [Conference]. https://doi.org/10.33965/ict_csc_wbc_2020_202008L011
Nikiforova, A., & Lnénicka, M. (2021). A multi-perspective knowledge-driven approach for analysis of the demand side of the Open Government Data portal. Government Information Quarterly, 38(4), Artigo 101622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101622
Nikiforova, A., & McBride, K. (2021). Open government data portal usability: A user-centred usability analysis of 41 open government data portals. Telematics and Informatics, 58, Artigo 101539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101539
Oliveira, D. T., & Nascimento Silva, P. (2024). Representação e recuperação de dados governamentais abertos: Uma revisão de literatura. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 22, Artigo e024029. https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8675828
Oliveira, D. G. D., & Orlando, O. Filho, (2019). Avaliação dos dados abertos da Previdência Social. Revista Meta: Avaliação, 11(31), Artigo 223. https://doi.org/10.22347/2175-2753v11i31.1757
Oliveira, M. I. S., De Oliveira, H. R., Oliveira, L. A., & Lóscio, B. F. (2016, June 8-10). Open Government Data Portals analysis: The Brazilian case. In 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research [Conference]. Shanghai, China. https://doi.org/10.1145/2912160.2912163
Open Government Data. (2007). The annotated 8 principles of open government data. Open Government Data https://opengovdata.org
Open Knowledge Brasil. (2017). Índice de dados abertos. https://ok.org.br/projetos/open-data-index
Open Knowledge Brasil. (2023). Nota metodológica: Índice de dados abertos para cidades 2023. https://ok.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/Metodologia-ODI-2023_v3.pdf
Ortiz-de-Urbina-Criado, M., Abella, A., & De-Pablos-Heredero, C. (2023). Proposal for an index measuring the reputation of open data portals: The Odapri. El Profesional de la información, Artículo e320312. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.may.12
Pansani, E. A., Jr., & Ferneda, E. (2018). Dados governamentais abertos: Uma análise da qualidade dos dados em portais de transparência brasileiros. In XIX Encontro Nacional de Pesquisa em Ciência da Informação (ENANCIB 2018) [Encontro]. Londrina, Paraná. http://enancib.marilia.unesp.br/index.php/XIX_ENANCIB/xixenancib/paper/view/1314/1707
Pereira, J. P. N. (2023). Panorama dos portais governamentais de dados abertos de Universidades Públicas Federais. [Dissertação de mestrado, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande]. Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFCG. http://dspace.sti.ufcg.edu.br:8080/xmlui/handle/riufcg/33148
Raca, V., Velinov, G., Cico, B., & Kon-Popovska, M. (2021). Application-based framework for analysis, monitoring and evaluation of National Open Data Portals. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2021.0121104
Raca, V., Velinov, G., Dzalev, S., & Kon-Popovska, M. (2022). A framework for evaluation and improvement of Open Government Data quality: Application to the Western Balkans National Open Data Portals. Sage Open, 12(2), Article 21582440221104813. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221104813
Rahmatika, M., Krismawati, D., Rahmawati, S. D., Arief, A., Sensuse, D. I., & Fadhil Dzulfikar, M. (2019, July 24-26). An Open Government Data maturity model: A case study in BPS-Statistics Indonesia. In 7th International Conference on Information and Communication Technology (ICoICT) [Conference]. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICoICT.2019.8835352
Ramalho, R. A. S., & Ouchi, M. T. (2011). Tecnologias semânticas: Novas perspectivas para a representação de recursos informacionais. Informação & Informação, 16(3), 60–75. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2011v16n3p60
Saxena, S. (2018). Open government data (OGD) in six Middle East countries: An evaluation of the national open data portals. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 20(4), 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-10-2017-0055
Saracevic, T. (1996). Ciência da informação: Origem, evolução e relações. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, 1(1). https://periodicos.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/22308
Saracevic, T. (1999). Information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(12), 1051–1063. https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/jamest/v50y1999i12p1051-1063.html
Sheoran, S., Mohanasundaram, S., Kasilingam, R., & Vij, S. (2023). Usability and accessibility of open Government Data Portals of countries worldwide: An application of TOPSIS and entropy weight method. International Journal of Electronic Government Research, 19(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJEGR.322307
Silva, R. E., Santos, P. L. V. A. C., & Ferneda, E. (2013). Modelos de recuperação de informação e web semântica: A questão da relevância. Informação & Informação, 18(3), 27–44. https://doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2013v18n3p27
Silva, S. P. D., Soares, A. T. N., Cesar, D. J. T., & Rabelo, L. E. M. (2020). Indicadores para avaliação qualitativa de Dados Abertos: Inteligibilidade, operacionalidade e interatividade nos datasets do Governo Federal no Portal Brasileiro de Dados Abertos. Informação & Sociedade: Estudos, 30(3), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.1809-4783.2020v30n3.52469
Solar, M., Concha, G., Meijueiro, L. (2012). A model to assess Open Government Data in public agencies. In: Scholl, H.J., Janssen, M., Wimmer, M.A., Moe, C.E., Flak, L.S. (Eds.) Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 7443, pp. 210-221). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_18
Sripramong, S., Anutariya, C., Buranarach, M., Tumsangthong, P., & Wutthitasarn, T. (2021, November 10-12). Development of business intelligence framework for open government data portal usage analysis: A case study of Thailand. In 13th International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering (KSE) [Conference]. Bangkok, Thailand https://doi.org/10.1109/KSE53942.2021.9648771
Tang, R., & Jiang, J. (2021). Characteristics of Open Government Data (OGD) around the world: A country-based comparative meta-analysis. Data and Information Management, 5(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.2478/dim-2020-0026
Torino, E., Trevisan, G. L., & Vidotti, S. A. B. G. (2019). Dados abertos CAPES: Um olhar à luz dos desafios para publicação de dados na web. https://riut.utfpr.edu.br/jspui/bitstream/1/4812/1/dadosabertosdesafiosdisponibilizacaoweb.pdf
Umbrich, J., Neumaier, S., & Polleres, A. (2015, August 24-26). Quality assessment and evolution of Open Data Portals. In 3rd International Conference on Future Internet of Things and Cloud [Conference]. Rome, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloud.2015.82
Utamachant, P., & Anutariya, C. (2018, July 11-13). An analysis of high-value datasets: A case study of Thailand’s Open Government Data. In 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE) [Conference]. Nakhonpathom, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/JCSSE.2018.8457350
Vetrò, A., Canova, L., Torchiano, M., Minotas, C. O., Iemma, R., & Morando, F. (2016). Open data quality measurement framework: Definition and application to Open Government Data. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 325–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221104813
Warraich, N. F., & Rasool, T. (2023). Assessing the readability of open data portals: a case study of Open Data Pakistan. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 28(3), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.22452/mjlis.vol28no3.5
Wentzel, B., Kirstein, F., Jastrow, T., Sturm, R., Peters, M., & Schimmler, S. (2023). An extensive methodology and framework for quality assessment of DCAT-AP datasets. In I. Lindgren, C. Csáki, E. Kalampokis, M. Janssen, G. Viale Pereira, S. Virkar, E. Tambouris, & A. Zuiderwijk (Orgs.), Electronic Government (Vol. 14130, pp. 262–278). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41138-0_17
Xia, W., Xu, Z., & Mao, C. (2017, November 11-12). User-driven filtering and ranking of topical datasets based on overall data quality. In 14th Web Information Systems and Applications Conference (WISA) [Conference]. Liuzhou, China. https://doi.org/10.1109/WISA.2017.24
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 André Luiz Guimarães Amorim, Patrícia Nascimento Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
