Creative commons licenses in the brazilian scientific periodicals of information science: open access or free access?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2018.424

Keywords:

Academic journals, Copyright, Creative commons, Licenses, Open access

Abstract

Objective. This paper analyze the active Brazilian journals of Information Science listed in the BRAPCI database, according to their copyright and Creative Commons (CC) licenses, in order to identify the access policy, the license adopted and its availability on the web.

Method. The methodology focus on descriptive and documentary features in 52 journals, of which 34 were active, during the period of 2015-2017.

Results. The main results are that most journals are concentrated in the Qualis/Capes B1 listing (24%); 59% have any information about the DOAJ portal; 94% have a free access policy section; 53% of journals have CC licenses, but 18% present errors or contradictions in their licenses; within those with a CC license, 50% use Recognition - Noncommercial (by nc); 24% of the journals are protected by traditional copyright; 56% offer some CC information in the policy link section; the copyright statement appears in 79% of the journals but just 38% use this section to show information about the type of license used.

Conclusions. In general terms, there is a direct relationship between open access to Information Science journals and free access. The focus of the publishers is to offer the contents without the users having to pay, excluding another important aspect: the rights assigned.

 

Author Biographies

Enrique Muriel-Torrado, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

Professor do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência da Informação da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (PGCIN/UFSC).

Adilson Luiz Pinto, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina - UFSC

Professor do Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência da Informação da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (PGCIN/UFSC).

References

ABADAL, E. et al. Spanish scholarly journals in WoS and Scopus: the impact of open access. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, v. 47, n. 1, p. 77-96, 2015.

BAILEY, C. W. Open Access Bibliography: liberating scholarly, literature with e-prints and open access journals. Washington: Association of Research Libraries, 2005.

BAILEY, C. W. What is open access? In: JACOBS, N. (eds). Open Access: key strategic, technical and economic aspects. Oxford: Elsevier, 2006. p. 13-26.

BERLIM. Berlin declaration on open access to knowledge in the sicence and humanities. Open Access Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, 2003. Disponível: https://openaccess.mpg.de/Berlin-Declaration. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2017.

BETHESDA. Bethesda statement on open access publishing. Meeting on open access publishing, 2003. Disponível em: http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/bethesda.htm. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2017.

BUDAPESTE. Read the Budapeste open access iniciative. Budapeste open access initiative, Hungria, 2002. Disponível em: http://www.budapestopenaccessinitiative.org/read. Acesso em: 17 jan. 2017.

CARROLL, M. W. Why Full Open Access Matters. PLoS Biology, v. 9, n. 11, p. e1001210, 29 nov. 2011.

CERDA SILVA, A.; LARA, J. Políticas Editoriales de Publicaciones Académicas en Línea en Latinoamérica. Santiago de Chile: ONG Derechos Digitales. 2011. Disponível em: https://www.derechosdigitales.org/wp-content/uploads/Informe-Politicas_Editoriales_de_Publicaciones1.pdf. Acesso em: 15 jan. 2017.

DIAS, C. A. Comunicação científica. 1999. Disponível em: http://www.geocities.com/claudiaad/. Acesso em: 31 jan. 2017.

DOAJ. About DOAJ. 2017. Disponível em: https://doaj.org/about#aimscope. Acesso em 02 jan. 2017.

HERBERT, R. Three masters: the stringed instrument collection in the Library of Congress. Washington: The Library of Congress, 1983.

HALLEY, E.; REED, L.J. Degress of moratlity of mankind. Maryland: The John Hopkins Press, 1942.

IFLA. Diretrizes para o manifesto IFLA/Unesco sobre a Internet. Haia: IFLA, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/faife/publications/policy-documents/internet-manifesto-guidelines-pt.pdf. Acesso em 04 jan. 2017.

LABASTIDA, I.; IGLESIAS, C. Guía sobre gestión de derechos de autor y acceso abierto en bibliotecas, servicios de documentación y archivos. Madrid: SEDIC, 2006. Disponível em: http://blogs.ujaen.es/abiertobuja/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/dchos_autor_normaweb.01.07.pdf. Acesso em: 13 jan. 2017.

MORGAN, B.T. Historie du Journal des Sçavans depui 1665 jusqu´en 1701. Paris: Press Universitares de France, 1928.

MURIEL-TORRADO, E.; FERNÁNDEZ-MOLINA, J.C. Enseñanza digital versus derechos de autor: el papel de la biblioteca universitaria en apoyo de profesores y alumnos. Encontros Bibli, v. 19, n. 39, p. 205–226, 2014. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufsc.br/index.php/eb/article/viewFile/1518-2924.2014v19n39p205/26584. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2017.

ORTELLADO, P.; MACHADO, J.A. Direitos autorais e o acesso às publicações científicas. Revista Adusp, agosto, 2006. Disponível em: http://www.adusp.org.br/files/revistas/37/r37a01.pdf. Acesso em: 26 jan. 2017.

SÁNCHEZ-TARRAGÓ, N. et al. Las revistas científicas en América Latina hacia el camino del acceso abierto: un diagnóstico de políticas y estrategias editoriales. Transinformação, v. 28, n. 2, p. 159-172, 2016.

SUBER, P. A Very Brief Introduction to Open Access. 2004. Disponível em: http://www.livingreviews.org/open-access.html. Acesso em: 26 jan. 2017.

SUBER, P. Gratis and livre open access. Sparc, n. 124, 2008. Disponível: http://sparcopen.org/our-work/gratis-and-libre-open-access/. Acesso em: 26 jan. 2017.

VIANA, C.L.M.; MÁRDERO ARELLANO, M.A. Diálogo científico: e-prints como um ambiente virtual aberto da comunicação científica. In: Proceedings 1a Conferência Iberoamericana de Publicações Eletrônicas no Contexto da Comunicação Científica - CIPECC, Brasília, p. 155-163, 2006.

Published

2018-07-02

How to Cite

Muriel-Torrado, E., & Pinto, A. L. (2018). Creative commons licenses in the brazilian scientific periodicals of information science: open access or free access?. Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, (71), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2018.424

Issue

Section

Original

Most read articles by the same author(s)