Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico 
Surgimiento y desarrollo del método Delphi: una perspectiva cienciométrica
Resumen
El presente trabajo tiene como objetivo caracterizar el desarrollo del método Delphi, a partir de indicadores cienciométricos relacionados con publicaciones de elevados índices de calidad. A partir de una búsqueda automatizada en Scopus se conforma una base de datos de 10341 documentos, registrados desde 1969. Como principales resultados, se observa un crecimiento acelerado de la actividad científico-técnica relacionada con este método, se constata el impacto de los documentos publicados en una amplia heterogeneidad de campos del conocimiento científico, se identifican colegios invisibles determinados por complejas redes de colaboración científica, y también se exploran nuevas áreas y tendencias de desarrollo. Aunque la marcada variedad de terminologías afines al método Delphi obstaculizan el procesamiento de la información, se concluye que las técnicas cienciométricas son efectivas para caracterizar el desarrollo de este método, incluso más allá del marco de la prospectiva.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDFReferencias
Archambault, E., & Larivière, V. (2010). The limits of bibliometrics for the analysis of the social sciences and humanities literature. In World Social Sciences Report (pp. 251-254). International Social Science Council: UNESCO Publishing. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001883/188333e.pdf
Bornmann, L., Thor, A., Marx, W., & Schier, H. (2016). The application of bibliometrics to research evaluation in the humanities and social sciences: An exploratory study using normalized Google Scholar data for the publications of a research institute. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(11), 2778-2789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23627
Brown, B. B. (1970). La técnica Delfos. Metodología usada para obtener la opinión de los expertos. Revista Española de la Opinión Pública, 21/22, 217-226 (vid. Rand Corporation Paper P-3925, feb. 1968). http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40181465
Caron, C., Roche, S., Goyer, D., & Jaton, A. (2008). GIScience journals ranking and evaluation: an international Delphi study. Transactions in GIS, 12(3), 293-321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9671.2008.01106.x
Coates, J. F. (1975). In defense of Delphi: A review of Delphi assessment, expert opinion, forecasting, and group process by H. Sackman. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 7(2), 193-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(75)90058-X
Cruz-Ramírez, M., Escalona-Reyes, M., Cabrera-García, S., & Martínez-Cepena, M. C. (2014). Análisis cienciométrico de las publicaciones educacionales cubanas en la WoS y Scopus (2003-2012). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 37(3), e058. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.3.1119
Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg-Thompson, S., Carusi, D. A., & Gornbein, J. (1994). The neuropsychiatric inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia. Neurology, 44(12), 2308-2314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.44.12.2308
Dalkey, N., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
Davidson, P. L. (2013). The Delphi technique in doctoral research: Considerations and rationale. Review of Higher Education & Self-Learning, 6(22), 53-65. https://research.phoenix.edu/sites/default/files/publication-files/The%20Delphi%20technique%20in%20doctoral%20research_1.pdf
Dellinger, R. P., Levy, M. M., Carlet, J. M., Bion, J., Parker, M. M., Jaeschke, R., … Vincent, J.-L. (2008). Surviving sepsis campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Critical Care Medicine, 36(1), 296-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41
de Villiers, M. R., de Villiers, P. J. T., & Kent, A. P. (2005). The Delphi technique in health sciences education research. Medical Teacher, 27(7), 639-643. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13611260500069947
Diamond, I. R., Grant, R. C., Feldman, B. M., Pencharz, P. B., Ling, S. C., Moore, A. M., & Wales, P. W. (2014). Defining consensus: a systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(4), 401-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.12.002
Donohoe, H., Stellefson, M., & Tennant, B. (2012). Advantages and limitations of the e-Delphi technique. American Journal of Health Education, 43(1), 38-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19325037.2012.10599216
Dror, Y. (1970). La predicción de lo políticamente posible. Revista Española de la Opinión Pública, 21/22, 89-98 (vid. Rand Corporation Paper P-4044, apr. 1969). http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40181461
García-Aracil, A., & Palomares-Montero, D. (2012). Indicadores para la evaluación de las instituciones universitarias: validación a través del método Delphi. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35(1), 119-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2012.1.863
Gargon, E., Gurung, B., Medley, N., Altman, D. G., Blazeby, J. M., Clarke, M., & Williamson, P. R. (2014). Choosing important health outcomes for comparative effectiveness research: a systematic review. PLoS ONE, 9(6), e99111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099111
Gear, C., Koziol-McLain, J., Wilson, D., Rae, N., Samuel, H., Clark, F., & McNeill, E. (2012). Primary healthcare response to family violence: A Delphi evaluation tool. Quality in Primary Care, 20(1), 15-30. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/articles/22584364/
Hallowell, M. R., & Gambatese, J. A. (2010). Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136(1), 99-107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000137
Hasson, F., & Keeney, S. (2011). Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(9), 1695-1704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.04.005
Herbohn, J., Harrison, S., & Emtage, N. (1999) Response to comments of Don Nicholson, Australian Forestry, 62(3), 285-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049158.1999.10674794
Hicks, D. (1999). The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics, 44(2), 193-295. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02457380
Kaplan, A., Skogstad, A. L., & Girshick, M. A. (1950). The prediction of social and technological events. Public Opinion Quarterly, 14(1), 93-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/266153
Kauko, K., & Palmroos, P. (2014). The Delphi method in forecasting financial markets. An experimental study. International Journal of Forecasting, 30(2), 313-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2013.09.007
Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & Mckenna, H. (2011). The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Landeta, J. (1999). El Método Delphi: Una Técnica de Previsión para la Incertidumbre. Barcelona: Ariel.
Landeta, J. (2011). Hybrid Delphi: A methodology to facilitate contribution from experts in professional contexts. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(9), 1629-1641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.03.009
Landeta, J., Barrutia, J., Hoyos, J., & Araujo, A. (2014). Initiatives for the improvement of continuous management training. Cuadernos de Gestión, 15(1), 61-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.5295/cdg.130411jl
Lin, V. S., & Song, H. (2014). A review of Delphi forecasting research in tourism. Current Issues in Tourism. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13683500.2014.967187
Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. London: Addison-Wesley.
Linstone, H., & Turoff, M. (2011). Delphi: A brief look backward and forward. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(9), 1712-1719. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.techfore.2010.09.011
Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317-323. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24529203
Meshkat, B., Cowman, S., Gethin, G., Ryan, K., Wiley, M., Brick, A., … Mulligan, M. (2014). Using an e-Delphi technique in achieving consensus across disciplines for developing best practice in day surgery in Ireland. Journal of Hospital Administration, 3(4), 1-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/jha.v3n4p1
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., Stroup, D. F., … Yusuf, S. (1999). Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. The Lancet, 354(9193), 1896-1900. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04149-5
Moreira, M. (2014). Técnica Delphi: metodologia para pesquisas em educação no Brasil. Revista de Educação. 19(1), 63-71. http://periodicos.puc-campinas.edu.br/seer/index.php/reveducacao/article/view/2616
Mullen, P. M. (2003). Delphi: myths and reality. Journal of Health Organization and Management, 17(1), 37-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14777260310469319
Noack, A. (2007). Energy models for graph clustering. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 11(2), 453-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.7155/jgaa.00154
Okoli, C., & Pawlowski, S. D. (2004). The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Information & Management, 42(1), 15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.11.002
Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: a powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441-453, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601
Papadimitriou, F., & Kidman, G. (2012). Statistical and scientometric analysis of international research in geographical and environmental education. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 21(1), 11-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2012.639153
Powell, C. (2003). The Delphi technique: myths and realities. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(4), 376-382. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02537.x
Price, D. J. S. (1963). Little Science, Big Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Qureshi, M. I., Bhatti, M. N., Rasli, A. M., Yasir, M., & Zaman, K. (2014). The Delphi method for internationalization of higher education in Pakistan: integrating theory of constraints and quality function deployment. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(20), 2702-2710. http://dx.doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p270
Rekalde, I., Landeta, J., & Albizu, E. (2015). Determining factors in the effectiveness of executive coaching as a management development tool. Management Decision, 53(8), pp. 1-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2014-0666
Rieger, W. (1986). Directions in Delphi developments: dissertations and their quality. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 29(2), 195-204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(86)90063-6
Robson, N., & Rew, D. (2010). Collective wisdom and decision making in surgical oncology. European Journal of Surgical Oncology, 36(3), 230-236. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2010.01.002
Rowe, G., & Wright, G. (1999). The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: Issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, 15(4), 353-375. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(99)00018-7
Sackman, H. (1974). Delphi Assessment: Expert Opinion, Forecasting, and Group Process. Santa Monica: Rand Corporation Paper R-1283-PR. http://www.rand.org/pubs/reports/2006/R1283.pdf
Tsai, C.-C., Corley, E. A., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Collaboration experiences across scientific disciplines and cohorts. Scientometrics, 108(2), 505-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1997-z
Vallejo, M., Ocaña, A., Bueno, Á., Torralbo, M., & Fernández, A. (2005). Producción científica sobre educación multicultural contenida en las bases de datos Social Science Citation Index y Arts y Humanities Citation Index (1956-2003). Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 28(2), 206-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/redc.2005.v28.i2.169
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Vollmar, H. C., Ostermann, T., & Redaèlli, M. (2015). Using the scenario method in the context of health and health care: a scoping review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15(1), 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0083-1
von der Gracht, H. A. (2012). Consensus measurement in Delphi studies. Review and implications for future quality assurance. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 79(8), 1525-1536. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.techfore.2012.04.013
Xiao, J., Douglas, D., Lee, A. H., & Vemuri, S. R. (1997). A Delphi evaluation of the factors influencing length of stay in Australian hospitals. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 12(3), 207-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1751(199707/09)12:3<207::AID-HPM480>3.0.CO;2-V
Zang, L., Fan, N., Hai, Y., Lu, S. B., Su, Q. J., Yang, J. C., … Gao, Y. J. (2015). Using the modified Delphi method to establish a new Chinese clinical consensus of the treatments for cervical radiculopathy. European Spine Journal, 24(6), 1116-1126. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3856-7
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2018.470
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Copyright (c) 2018 Miguel Cruz Ramírez, José Alberto Rúa Vásquez
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento 4.0 Internacional.
