Evaluating Interaction in Institutional Forums

a case study of Ibict and Its supported technologies

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2025.1251

Keywords:

Discussion forums, Ibict, Open technologies, Digital interaction, Webometrics

Abstract

Objective. This study analyzes the evolution of digital interactions within the Forum of the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology (Ibict), highlighting its value as a tool for knowledge sharing and collaborative problem-solving. User behavior, response effectiveness, popular topics, and informational gaps were assessed. Method. A mixed-methods approach was used, with an emphasis on web metrics. Data were collected between 2020 and 2023. Results. Findings show that active moderation led to faster responses, higher engagement during peak periods, and renewed activity in 2023. Conclusions. The
Ibict Forum is a strategic space for technical support and collaborative knowledge-building, particularly in the context of open technologies.

Author Biographies

Bernardo Dionízio Vechi, Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (Ibict)

Bachelor's degree in Library Science from the University of Brasília (UnB). Librarian and researcher at the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology (Ibict), working in scientific publishing, metadata, information systems, Open Science, and technical training in the use of the Open Journal Systems (OJS) platform.

Diego José Macêdo, Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (Ibict)

Master's degree in Information Science from the University of Brasilia. Bachelor's degree in Information Systems from the Catholic University of Brasilia. Currently a technologist at the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology (Ibict).

Milton Shintaku, Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (Ibict)

PhD in Information Science from the University of Brasília. Coordinator of Information Technology (Cotec) at the Brazilian Institute of Information in Science and Technology (Ibict).

References

Benbunan-Fich, R., & Hiltz, S. R. (1999). Impacts of asynchronous learning networks on individual and group problem solving: A field experiment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008669710763

Bicalho, R. N. M., & Oliveira, M. C. S. L. (2012). O processo dialógico de construção do conhecimento em fóruns de discussão. Interface: Comunicação, Saúde, Educação, 16, 469–484. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-32832012005000028

Brasil. (2011). Lei n. 12.527, de 18 de novembro de 2011. Regula o acesso a informações previsto no inciso XXXIII do art. 5º. Diário Oficial da União. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2011/lei/l12527.htm

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Projeto de pesquisa: método qualitativo, quantitativo e misto (2ª ed.). Artmed.

Funo, L. B. A., Elstermann, A.-K., & Souza, M. G. (2015). Fóruns no ambiente Teleduc: Reflexões sobre o papel dos mediadores e estratégias de gerenciamento de debates. Revista Brasileira de Linguística Aplicada, 15, 31–59. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-639820156120

Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2–3), 87–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6

Gouveia, F. C. (2013). Altmetria: Métricas de produção científica para além das citações. Liinc em Revista, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.18617/liinc.v9i1.569

Harnad, S., Carr, L., Brody, T., & Swan, A. (2004). The access/impact problem and the green and gold roads to open access. Serials Review, 30(4), 310–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serrev.2004.09.013

Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Siemens, G., & Hatala, M. (2015). Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.06.002

Macedo, D., Shintaku, M., & Saldanha, G. S. (2013). Biblioteca Digital Brasileira de Teses e Dissertações: Dez anos de interoperabilidade [pôster]. In 4ª Conferência Luso-Brasileira sobre Acesso Aberto. Universidade de São Paulo.

Miki, H. (1989). Micro-ISIS: Uma ferramenta para o gerenciamento de bases de dados bibliográficas. Ciência da Informação, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v18i1.317

Oddone, N. E., Shintaku, M., & Saldanha, G. S. (2023). Lydia de Queiroz Sambaquy: 1954 a 1965. In D. A. P. Cunha (Org.), Ibict 70 anos: Um resgate histórico daqueles que fizeram o instituto (pp. 18–32). Ibict. https://doi.org/10.22477/9786589167457.cap1

Rossetti, A. G., & Morales, A. B. T. (2007). O papel das tecnologias da informação na gestão do conhecimento. Ciência da Informação, 36(1), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v36i1.1191

Stuart, D. (2014). Web metrics for library and information professionals. Facet Publishing.

Triska, R., & Café, L. (2001). Arquivos abertos: Subprojeto da Biblioteca Digital Brasileira. Ciência da Informação, 30(3), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.18225/ci.inf.v30i3.917

Wenger, E., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.

Zhou, Y., Cai, D., Lian, X., Fan, W., & Ma, W. (2009). Routing questions to the right users in online communities. In 2009 IEEE 25th International Conference on Data Engineering (pp. 135–175). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2009.44

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Vechi, B. D., Macêdo, D. J., & Shintaku, M. (2025). Evaluating Interaction in Institutional Forums: a case study of Ibict and Its supported technologies. Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, (esp.), e021. https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2025.1251

Issue

Section

Original