Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals

Authors

  • Geraldo Ceni Coelho Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul - UFFS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2018.468

Keywords:

Electronic journals, Graduation, Hirsch Index, Scientometrics, University extension

Abstract

Objective. The academic multidisciplinary journals peer reviewed dedicated to the university extension (ReX) are relatively numerous in Brazil. Investigations on their impact are scarce. The aim of this research was to verify if the ReX present bibliometric differences in relation to other Brazilian multidisciplinary journals (RMulti).

Method. Citation parameters were obtained from the search engine Google Scholar (GA) for journals of the two groups. In addition, the relation between the citation parameters and the Brazilian WebQualis classification was analyzed.

Results. The impact factor based on the GA search engine (FGA) is widely variable and did not differ between the groups. The h5 index (GA) did not present a significant correlation with the FGA taking into account all the journals (r2 = 0.51, P = 0.0686). Among the RMulti there is a great correspondence between the higher WebQualis ranking and the FGA, and also between the median WebQualis ranking and the FGA. On the other hand, such relationship was not observed among the ReX.

Conclusions. Considering their impact, it was concluded that the ReX is undervalued in the WebQualis.

Author Biography

Geraldo Ceni Coelho, Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul - UFFS

Doutor em Ciências Farmacêuticas, Mestre em Botânica, Professor Adjunto da Universidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, campus Chapecó.

References

BARATA, R. Dez coisas que você deveria saber sobre o Qualis. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, v. 13, n. 1, p. 13-40, 2016.

BOLLEN, J.; VAN DE SOMPEL, H.; HAGBERG, A.; CHUTE, R. A principal component analysis of 39 scientific impact measures. PloS One, v. 4, n. 6, e6022, 2009.

BORNMANN, L. DANIEL, H.-D. What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, v. 64, n. 1, p. 45-80, 2008.

BREMBS, B.; BUTTON, K.; MUNAFÒ, M. Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank. Frontiers in human Neuroscience, v. 7, 2013.

CAPES. Plataforma Sucupira. Brasilía: CAPES, 2016. Disponível em < https://sucupira.capes.gov.br/sucupira/public/consultas/coleta/veiculoPublicacaoQualis/listaConsultaGeralPeriodicos.jsf > Acesso em: 07 maio 2017.

COELHO, G. C. O papel pedagógico da Extensão Universitária. Em Extensão, v. 13, n. 2, p. 11-24, 2014a.

COELHO, G. C. Revistas acadêmicas de extensão universitária no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Extensão Universitária, v. 5, n. 2, p. 69-75, 2014b.

CORDEIRO, F. M. G. da S.; DE ANDRADE, F. C. B. Ensino-pesquisa-extensão: um exercício de indissociabilidade na pós-graduação. Revista Brasileira de Educação, v. 14, n. 41, p. 269-280, 2009.

DELGADO-LÓPEZ-CÓZAR, E.; CABEZAS-CLAVIJO, Á. Ranking journals: could Google scholar metrics be an alternative to journal citation reports and Scimago journal rank? Learned Publishing, v. 26, n. 2, p. 101-113, 2013.

FIRME, S. M.; CORREA, T. P. P.; MIRANDA, A. C. D.; SHINTAKU, M. Revistas de extensão e o acesso aberto ao conhecimento: mapeamento dos periódicos eletrônicos no Brasil. Ágora, v. 26, n. 52, p. 151-178, 2016.

GARFIELD, E. Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation – journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, v. 178, p. 471-479, 1972.

GARFIELD, E. Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool?. Scientometrics, v. 1, n.4, p. 359-375, 1979.

GARFIELD, E. The agony and the ecstasy - the history and meaning

of the journal impact factor. JAMA, v. 295, n. 1, p. 90-93, 2006.

HARZING, A. W. A preliminary test of Google Scholar as a source for citation data: a longitudinal study of Nobel prize winners. Scientometrics, v. 94, n. 3, p. 1057-1075, 2013.

HICKS, D.; WOUTERS, P.; WALTMAN, L.; DE RIJCKE, S.; RAFOLS, I. The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, v. 520, n. 7548, p. 429, 2015.

JACSÓ, P. Google Scholar author citation tracker: is it too little, too late? Online Information Review, v. 36, n. 1, p. 126–141, 2012.

JINHA, A. E. Article 50 million: an estimate of the number of scholarly articles in existence. Learned Publishing, v. 23, n. 3, p. 258–263, 2010.

KNUDSON, D. Citation rates for highly-cited papers from different sub-disciplinary areas within kinesiology. Chronicle of Kinesiology in Higher Education, v. 25, n. 2, p. 9-17, 2014.

LETA, J. Indicadores de desempenho, ciência brasileira e a cobertura das bases informacionais. Revista USP, n. 89, p. 62-67, 2011.

MORAES, M.; CARELLI, A. E. A interdisciplinaridade na Ciência da Informação pela perspectiva da análise de citações. Em Questão, v. 22, n. 1, p. 137-160, 2016.

REDNER, S. How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, v. 4, n. 2, p. 131-134, 1998.

ROCHA, P. E. D. Trajetórias e perspectivas da interdisciplinaridade ambiental na pós-graduação brasileira. Ambiente & Sociedade, v. 6, n. 2, p. 155-182, 2003.

SCimago. SJR - SCImago Journal & Country Rank. Disponível em: < http://www.scimagojr.com > Acesso em: 07 maio 2017.

SOMA, N. Y.; ALVES, A. D.; YANASSE, H. H. O Qualis Periódicos e sua utilização nas avaliações. Revista Brasileira de Pós-Graduação, v. 13, n. 1, p. 2016.

WANG, D.; SONG, C.; BARABÁSI, A.-L. Quantifying long-term scientific impact. Science, v. 342, n. 6154, p. 127-132, 2013.

Published

2018-07-02

How to Cite

Coelho, G. C. (2018). Impact assessment of Brazilian university extension periodicals. Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, (71), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2018.468

Issue

Section

Original