The collection development in university libraries in the view of complexity theory and domain analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2018.490Keywords:
Collection development, Complexity theory, Domain analysis, University librariesAbstract
Objective. This study proposed a reflection on collection development for university libraries inspired by the Complexity Theory and Domain Analysis. A theoretical contribution was sought in Morin's Complexity Theory and in the social paradigm of Information Science, more specifically in Hjørland's Domain Analysis, to think about how guidelines could be woven for the Collection Development in university libraries in order to face the challenges of Contemporaneity.
Method. . It establishes the Complexity Theory assumptions and the qualitative perspective to approach the problem. To do so, it relies on four analysis dimensions: the epistemological, the published thinking, the institutionalized thinking and of the current thinking.
Results. The results indicate that collection development includes innumerous elements and faces difficulties, it is guided by institutional and users demands, it requires the participation of the academic community, including in drafting the policy, which should be aligned to the mission of the institution and constantly updated.
Conclusions. It concludes that thinking about the guidelines for Collection Development, adopting the social perspective of the domain analysis and based on Morin’s tetralogical ring, contributes to the denudation of issues surrounding that process in university librariesReferences
ADEYOMOYE, J. I. An assessment of the impact of Nigerian Book Foundation (NBF) on the development of library collections in private university libraries in South-West geo-political zone of Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, n. 4, p. 1-10, 2011. Disponível em: http://go.galegroup.com.ez46.periodicos.capes.gov.br/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA256863798&v=2.1&u=capes&it=r&p=AONE&sw=w&asid=640f27bcec7a9f2810b118cfaaae12d7 . Acesso em: 09 maio 2015.
BEHR, M.; HILL, R. Mining e-reserves data for collection assessment: an analysis of how instructors use library collections to support distance learners. Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning, v. 6, n. 3-4, p. 159-179, 2012.
BOGDAN, R. C.; BIKLEN, S. K. Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto: Porto Editora, 1994.
BOOTH, H. A.; O'BRIEN, K. Demand-driven cooperative collection development: three case studies from the USA. Interlending & Document Supply, v. 39, n. 3, p. 148-155, 2011. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/02641611111164636 . Acesso em: 01 dez. 2015.
BORIN, J.; YI, H. Assessing an academic library collection through capacity and usage indicators: testing a multi-dimensional model. Collection Building,v. 30, n.3, p. 120-125, 2011. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951111146956 . Acesso em: 1 jun. 2015.
BOUDEWYNS, D. K.; KLUG, S. L. Collection development strategies for community engagement. Collection Management, v. 39, p. 145-160, 2014. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.890994 . Acesso em: 12 jun. 2015.
CAPURRO, R. Epistemologia e Ciência da Informação. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 5, 2003. Anais... Belo Horizonte: UFMG, 2003. p.1-15.
CAPURRO, R.; HJØRLAND, B. O conceito de informação. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, v.12, n.1, p.148-207, 2007.
CHAPUTULA, A. H. Collection development practices in private university libraries in Malawi: the case of University of Livingstonia and Adventist University Libraries. Library Management, v. 35, n.3, p. 150-163, 2014. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/LM-06-2013-0050 . Acesso em: 02 jun. 2015
CHAPUTULA, A. H.; KANYUNDO, A. J. Collection development policy: how its absence has affected collection development practices at Mzuzu University Library. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science,v. 46, n. 4, p. 317-325, 2014. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614531005 . Acesso em: 02 jun. 2015
COSTELLO, B. K. Does book subject influence format preference? survey results from a sample of graduate business school students, staff, and faculty. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, v. 19, p.319-332, 2014. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2014.946375 . Acesso em: 9 set. 2016.
CUNHA, M. B. da; CAVALCANTI, C. R. Dicionário de biblioteconomia e arquivologia. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos, 2008.
DANIELSON, R. A dual approach to assessing collection development and acquisitions for academic libraries. Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services, v. 36, n.3-4, p. 84-96, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2012.09.002 . Acesso em: 10 mar. 2015.
DAVIS, K. Shared patron-driven acquisition within a consortium: the OCUL PDA Pilot. Serials Review, v. 38, p. 183-187, 2012.
DEMPSEY, L.; MALPAS, C.; LAVOIE, B. Collection directions: the evolution of library collections and collecting. Portal:Libraries and the Academy, v. 14, n.3, p. 393-423, 2014. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2014.0013 . Acesso em: 10 jun. 2015.
DETMERING, R.; SPROLES, C. Reference in transition: a case study in reference collection development. Collection Building, v. 31, n. 1, p. 19–22, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951211199146 . Acesso em: 10 jun. 2015.
DIERS, B.; SIMPSON, S. At your leisure: establishing a popular reading collection. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, v. 7, n. 2, p. 49-66, 2012.
DOUGLAS, C. S. Revising a collection development policy in a rapidly changing environment. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, v.8, n.1, p. 15-21, 2011. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2011.551487 . Acesso em: 15 jun. 2015.
DOWNEY, K. et al. A comparative study of print book and dda ebook acquisition and use. Technical Services Quarterly, v. 31, p. 139-160, 2014.
DUNCAN, C. J.; O'GARA, G. M. Building holistic and agile collection development and assessment. Performance Measurement and Metrics, v. 16, n. 1, p. 62-85, 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PMM-12-2014-0041 . Acesso em: 19 abr. 2016.
FERRIS, K.; BUCK, T. H. An ethos of access: how a small academic library transformed its collection-building processes. Collection Management, v. 39, n. 2-3, p. 127-144, 2014. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.900732 . Acesso em: 12 mar. 2015.
FOUGHT, R. L.; GAHN, P.; MILLS, Y. Promoting the library through the collection development policy: a case study. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, v. 11, n. 4, p. 169–178, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2014.969031 . Acesso em: 19 abr. 2016.
GIRI, R.; SEM, B.K.; MAHESH, G. Collection development in indian academic libraries: an empirical approach to determine the number of copies for acquisition. Journal of Library & Information Technology, v. 35, n. 3, p. 184-192, may 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.35.3.7806 . Acesso em: 9 set. 2016.
GRGIC, I. H. Gifts in Croatian public and academic libraries. Collection Building, v. 30, n.4, p. 167-171, 2011. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951111181137 . Acesso em: 15 jun. 2015.
HJØRLAND, B. Arguments for philosophical realism in library and information science. Library Trends, v. 52, n. 3, p. 488-506, 2004a.
HJØRLAND, B. Domain analysis: a socio-cognitive orientation for Information Science research. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology,v. 30, n.3, 2004b. Disponível em: http://www.asis.org/Bulletin/Feb-04/HJØRLAND.html . Acesso em: 15 jun. 2013.
HJØRLAND, B. Domain analysis in information science eleven approaches traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, v. 58, n. 4, p. 442-462, 2002a.
HJØRLAND, B. Epistemology and the sócio-cognitive perspective in Information Science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 53, n. 4, p. 257-270, 2002b.
HJØRLAND, B. What is knowledge organization? Knowlegde Organization, v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 86-101, 2008.
HJØRLAND, B.; ALBRECHTSEN, H. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain-analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, 1995.
HJØRLAND, B; HARTEL, J. Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains. Knowledge Organization, v. 30, n. 3/4, p. 239-245, 2003.
HUSSAIN, A.; ABALKHAIL, M. Determinants of library use, collections and services among the students of engineering: a case study of King Saud University. Collection Building, v. 32, n.3, 100-110, 2013. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/CB-07-2012-0033 . Acesso em 02 jun. 2015.
JINDAL, S.; PANT, A. Availability of e-books in science: case study of University of Delhi. TheElectronic Library, v.31, p. 313-328, 2013. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/EL-12-2010-0159 . Acesso em: 01 jun. 2015.
JOHNSON, A. M.; FINLEY, S.; SPROLES, C. Dismantling the reference collection. The Reference Librarian, v. 56, p. 161-173, 2015. Disponível em: http://doi.org/1080/02763877.2014.994192 . Acesso em: 12 set. 2016.
KACHALUBA, S. B.; BRADY, J. E.; CRITTEN, J. Developing humanities collections in the digital age: exploring humanities faculty engagement with electronic and print resources. College & Research Libraries, v. 75, n. 1, p. 91-108, jan. 2014.
KASALU, S.; OJIAMBO, J. B. Application of ICTs in collection development in private university libraries in Kenya. Collection Building, v. 31, n.1, p. 23-31, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951211199155 . Acesso em: 01 jun. 2015.
KELLY, M. Applying the tiers of assessment: a holistic and systematic approach to assessing library collections. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 40, p. 585-591, 2014. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133314001803 . Acesso em: 31 jul. 2015.
KETTERMAN, Elizabeth; HOOVER, Jeanne; CABLE, Kathy. Creating a shared neuroscience collection development policy. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, v. 9, n. 3, p. 197-203, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/15424065.2012.707076 . Acesso em: 12 maio 2016.
KIEFT, R. H.; PAYNE, L. Collective collection, collective action. Collection Management, v. 37, n. 3-4, p. 137-152, 2012. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2012.685411 . Acesso em: 01 dez. 2015.
KOHN, K. C. Usage-based collection evaluation with a curricular focus. College & Research Libraries, v. 74, n. 1, p. 85-97, 2013. Disponível em: http://crl.acrl.org/content/74/1/85.full.pdf+html . Acesso: 15 jan. 2015.
LADWIG, J. P.; MILLER, T. D. Are first-circulation patterns for monographs in the humanities different from the sciences? Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, v. 37, n. 3-4, p. 77-84, 2013.
LAKATOS, E. M.; MARCONI, M. de A. Fundamentos de metodologia científica. 7. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2010.
LANNON, A.; MCKINNON, D. Business e-books: what can be learned from vendor supplied statistics? Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, v. 18, p. 89-99, 2013.
LAWSON, K.; KING, C.; MATAVA, T. Interdisciplinarity on campus: how the publishing world is responding. Collection Building, v. 31, n.1, p. 4-10, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951211199119 . Acesso em: 17 jun. 2015.
LEVINE-CLARK, M. Access to everything: building the future academic library collection. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, v. 14, n. 3, p. 425–437, 2014.
LEWIS, D. W. From stacks to the Web: the transformation of academic library collecting. College and Research Libraries, v. 74, n. 2, p. 159-176, 2013. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.5860/crl-309 . Acesso em: 08 jun. 2015.
LINK, F. E. Are we there yet? An analysis of e-book equivalent coverage in highly-circulated titles at the College of New Jersey library. Collection Building, v. 31, n. 4, p. 132-135, 2012. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01604951211274034 . Acesso em: 01 fev. 2015.
LITTLE, G. Collection development in library and information science at ARL libraries. Collection Building, v. 30, n. 3, p. 135-139, 2011. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951111146983 . Acesso em: 08 jun. 2015.
MANGRUM, S.; POZZEBON, M. E. Use of collection development policies in electronic resource management. Collection Building, v. 31, n. 3, p. 108-114. 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951211243506 . Acesso em: 08 jun. 2015.
MARSHALL, D. H. Digital collection development for unique users: a veterinary medicine library’s approach. Interlending & Document Supply, v. 42, n. 4, p. 171–175, 2014. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/ILDS-09-2014-0041 . Acesso em: 02 jun. 2015.
MICHALAK, S. C. This changes everything: transforming the academic library. Journal of Library Administration, v. 52, p. 411-423, 2012. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2012.700801 . Acesso em: 10 set. 2016.
MILLER, A.; HARDER, K. J. Integration of Library Impact Statements into the Curricular Review Process. Journal of Library Administration, v. 54, p.543–561, 2014. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2014.964016 . Acesso em: 08 set. 2016.
MORIN, E. A cabeça bem feita: repensar a reforma, reformar o pensamento. 17. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2010.
MORIN, E. Ciência com consciência. 8. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil, 2005.
MORIN, E. Da necessidade de um pensamento complexo. In: MARTINS, F. M.; SILVA, J. M. da (Org.). Para navegar no século XXI: tecnologias do imaginário e cibercultura.3. ed. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2003a. p. 13-36.
MORIN, E. Educação e complexidade: os sete saberes e outros ensaios. São Paulo: Cortez, 2002.
MORIN, E. Entrevista. In: IDÉIAS contemporâneas: entrevistas do Le Monde. São Paulo: Ática, 1989. p. 33-40.
MORIN, E. Introdução ao pensamento complexo. 4. ed. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2011.
MORIN, E. O método 1: a natureza da natureza. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 1997.
MORIN, E. O método 2: a vida da vida. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 2001.
MORIN, E. O método 3: o conhecimento do conhecimento. 3. ed. Porto Alegre: Sulina, 1999.
MORIN, E. Os sete saberes necessários à educação do futuro. 8. ed. São Paulo: Cortez; Brasília: Unesco, 2003b.
MORIN, E.; CIURANA, E.-R.; MOTTA, R. D. Educar na era planetária: o pensamento complexo como método de aprendizagem no erro e na incerteza humana. São Paulo: Cortez, 2003.
MORRIS, E. B.Building a collection in electronic music: considerations and sources. Music Reference Services Quarterly, v. 15, n. 1, p. 34-40, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1080/10588167.2012.647588 . Acesso em: 01 jun. 2015.
MORRIS, S. E.; CURRIE, L. Remember me? content development in a user-centered services library. Collection Management, v. 39, n. 2-3, p. 96-109, 2014. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01462679.2014.891493 . Acesso em: 01 dez. 2015.
PEDERSEN, W. A.; ARCAND, J.; FORBIS, M. The big deal, interlibrary loan, and building the user-centered journal collection: a case study. Serials Review, v. 40, n. 4, p. 242-250, 2014.
PEOPLES, B.; TILLEY, C. Podcasts as an emerging information resource. College & Undergraduate Libraries, v. 18, p.44–57, 2011.
PERRET, R. Wanted dead or alive? Western genre items in the 21st century United States library. Library Collections, Acquisition and Technical Services, v. 36, n. 1-2, p. 39–52, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcats.2012.03.003 . Acesso em: 01 jun. 2015.
PICKETT, C. et al. Revisiting an abandoned practice: the death and resurrection of collection development policies. Collection Management, v. 36, n. 3, p. 165-181, 2011.
PROCTOR, J. Demand-driven acquisition and the sunk cost model. Collection Building, v. 34, n. 1, p. 2-5, 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/CB-06-2014-0033 . Acesso em: 1 jun. 2015.
PROCTOR, J.; BARSTOW, S. Partly cloudy with a chance of entertainment: an academic library's experience with a popular reading ebook resource. Journal of Library Administration, v. 53, n. 7-8, p. 401-411, 2013. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.882193 . Acesso em: 21 dez. 2015.
SAN JOSE MONTANO, B. The new paradigm of collection management in university libraries: from crisis to revolution. Collection Building, v. 33, n. 3, p. 90-97, 2014. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/CB-02-2014-0012 . Acesso em: 02 jun. 2015.
SCHROEDER, H. M. Acquiring, promoting, and analyzing nursing e-books: one academic library’s experiences. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, v.9, n.3, p.184-196, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1080/15424065.2012.707082 . Acesso em: 21 maio 2015.
SCHROEDER, R. When patrons call the shots: patron-driven acquisition at Brigham Young University. Collection Building, v. 31, n. 1, p. 11–14, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951211199128 . Acesso em: 08 jun. 2015.
SHEPHERD, J.; ARTEAGA, R. Social work students and e-books: a survey of use and perception. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, v. 33, n. 1, p. 15-28, 2014. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01639269.2014.866022 . Acesso em: 01 fev. 2016.
SMITH, S. L. Weeding considerations for an academic music collection. Music Reference Services Quarterly, v. 15, p. 22-33, 2012.
SONDERGAARD, T. F.; ANDERSEN, J.; HJORLAND, B. Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information: revising and updating the UNISIST model. Journal of Documentation, v. 59, n.3, p.278-320, 2003.
SOUZA, J. S. A participação do bibliotecário no acompanhamento de ementas de projetos pedagógicos para adequação do acervo: Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco – Campus Serra da Capivara. Revista Brasileira de Biblioteconomia e Documentação, São Paulo, v. 11, p.114-127, 2015. Disponível em: http://www.brapci.ufpr.br/brapci/v/a/20736 . Acesso em: 10 nov. 2016.
SPAHR, K.; WIEGAND, S. Library collections for the support of academic sport management programs. Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship, v.17, n. 3, p. 220-241, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2012.686150 . Acesso em: 01 jun. 2015.
SPENCE, M.; MAWHINNEY, T.; BARSKY, E. How much is enough? examining computer science and civil engineering citation data to inform collection development and retention decisions in three large Canadian University libraries. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, v.71, p. 1-9, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.5062/F4ZS2TF7 . Acesso em: 02 jun. 2015.
TALER, I. The jewish studies book awards: a collection development strategy for non-sectarian academic libraries. Collection Building, v. 30, n. 1, p. 11-38, 2011. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951111104998 . Acesso em: 29 maio 2015.
TENNIS, J. T. Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, v.30, n. 3/4, p.191-195, 2003.
THOMAS, C. M.; CLYDE, J. Game as book: Selecting video games for academic libraries based on discipline specific knowledge. Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 39, n. 6, p. 522–527, 2013. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2013.07.002 . Acesso em: 01 jun. 2015.
THOMAS, W. J.; SHOUSE, D. L. Rules of thumb for deselecting, relocating, and retaining bound journals. Collection Building, v. 31, n. 3, p. 92-97, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1108/01604951211243470 . Acesso em: 01 jun. 2015.
TOREN, B. J. Bam! pow! graphic novels fight stereotypes in academic libraries: supporting, collecting, promoting. Technical Services Quarterly, v. 28, p. 55–69, 2011.
TYLER, D.C et al. Don’t fear the reader: librarian versus interlibrary loan patrondriven acquisition of print books at an academic library by relative collecting level and by library of congress classes and subclasses. College & Research Libraries, v. 75, n. 5, p. 684-704, 2014.
TYNAN, M.; MCCARNEY, E.. Click here to order this book: a case study of print and electronic patron-driven acquisition in University College Dublin. New Review of Academic Librarianship, v. 20, n. 2, p. 233-250, 2014.
UNESCO. Política de mudança e desenvolvimento do ensino superior. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond, 1999.
VASILEIOU, M.; ROWLEY, J.; HARTLEY, R. Perspectives on the future of e-books in libraries in universities. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, v. 44, n.4, p. 217-226, 2012. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.1177/0961000611434759 . Acesso em 02 jun. 2015.
WEITZEL, S. R. Elaboração de uma política de desenvolvimento de coleções em bibliotecas universitárias. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Interciência; Niterói: Intertexto, 2013.
WELLS, D.; SALLENBACH, A. Books and e-books in an academic library. The Australian Library Journal, v. 64, n. 3, p. 168-179, 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00049670.2015.1041216 . Acesso em: 9 set. 2016.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
