Editorial processes in scientific journals: bibliometric analysis based on open access articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2024.1179Keywords:
Bibliometrics, Journals, Peer review, Editorial Process, Scientific productionAbstract
Objective. The article presents an overview of the scientific production of the most relevant and emerging topics on editorial processes in scientific journals.
Theoretical foundations: Scientific communication theory and the peer review model are central to understanding how knowledge is validated and disseminated. Ethics in scientific research provides a framework for evaluating integrity and transparency in editorial processes. In addition, theories about diversity in scientific production are considered and the implications of technology in academic publishing are explored, including open access and digital tools for editorial management.
Method. The methodology consisted of the analysis of bibliometric indicators supported by Scopus and using tools such as Microsoft® Excel® and VOSviewer version 1.6.19 for information processing.
Results. The results show between 1990 and 2023 showed an exponential trend, with an R² of 24.75%, with 2022 being the most productive year. Spain led with 21%, followed by Brazil with 15%. Five prominent magazines contributed 22%. Authorship varied markedly, with 33% of the works written by two authors. Among those cited, works on peer review and diversity in review stand out. 15 collaborating authors and keywords such as "article", "open access," and "peer review" were identified.
Conclusions. It is concluded that the editorial processes in scientific journals have an essential role in the validation and dissemination of scientific knowledge and that their practices must be emphasized on peer review, research ethics, gender differences in authorship, technology, and other relevant aspects in the field of scientific publication and communication.
References
Al, U., y Soydal, I. (2017). Publication lag and early view effects in information science journals. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 69(2), 118–130. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-12-2016-0200.
Albort-Morant, G., Henseler, J., Leal-Millán, A., y Cepeda-Carrión, G. (2017). Mapping the Field: A Bibliometric Analysis of Green Innovation. Sustainability, 9(6), 1011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061011.
Aliaga, F. (2020). Evolución de la edición científica en revistas de Ciencias Sociales y determinación de Latinoamérica como ecosistema característico. RELIEVE, Investigación y evaluación educativa, 26(2), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.26.2.19206.
Artiles Castro, M. (2023). Actividad editorial y socialización de las ciencias. Doxa Comunicación. Revista Interdisciplinar De Estudios De Comunicación Y Ciencias Sociales, (38), 525-526. https://revistascientificas.uspceu.com/doxacomunicacion/article/view/2024.
Artigas, W., Suárez-Amaya, W., Casanova Romero, I., y Ganga-Contreras, F. (2023). Gerencia de Revistas Científicas: un concepto práctico que no se ha teorizado. Revista Dimensión Empresarial, 21(5), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.15665/dem.v21i1.3469
Artigas, W. y Gungula, E. (2020). Gestión de revistas a través de OJS: experiencia de éxito Angolana. Revista e-ciencias de la información, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15517/eci.v10i1.39771.
Baiget, T. (2020). Manual Scimago de Revistas Científicas. Creación, gestión y publicación. Ediciones Profesionales de la información, SL.
Bennett, R., Ellender, B., Mäkinen, T., Miya, T., Pattrick, P., Wasserman, R., Woodford, D., y Weyl, O. (2016). Ethical considerations for field research on fishes. Koedoe, 58(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v58i1.1353.
Campos-Asensio, C. (2018). Cómo elaborar una estrategia de búsqueda bibliográfica. Enfermería Intensiva, 29(4), 182–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfi.2018.09.001.
Candal-Pedreira, C., Rey-Brandariz, J., Varela-Lema, L., Pérez-Ríos, M., y Ruano-Ravina, A. (2023). Los desafíos de la revisión por pares: Cómo garantizar la calidad y transparencia del proceso editorial de las revistas científicas. Anales de Pediatría, 99(1), 54–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anpedi.2023.05.017.
Chang, H. y Kong, H. (2018). New Online Journal Management System. Health Inform Res.; 24(1), 1-2. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2018.24.1.1
Comité de Ética para Publicaciones. (COPE). (2021). Principios de Transparencia y Mejores Prácticas en Publicaciones Académicas. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.13
Cueva Estrada, J. M., Sumba Nacipucha, N., Meleán Romero, R., Artigas Morales, W., Cueva Ortiz, N., & Plaza Quimis, M. (2023a). Gestión del contenido en redes sociales, por revistas científicas indexadas en SciELO España. Revista De Comunicación De La SEECI, 56, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.15198/seeci.2023.56.e834
Cueva Estrada, J., Sumba Nacipucha, N., Paredes Floril, P., Sánchez-Bayón, A. y Carbo Guerrero, K. (2023b). Correlación entre Facebook y Google Scholar en el impacto de revistas científicas. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 81, 314-331. https://www.doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2023-1897.
Edwards, H., Schroeder, J., y Dugdale, H. (2018). Gender differences in authorships are not associated with publication bias in an evolutionary journal. PLOS ONE, 13(8), e0201725. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201725.
Falcó-Pegueroles, A., y Rodríguez-Martín, D. (2018). Diez cuestiones que debería considerar antes de enviar un artículo a una revista científica. Enfermería Intensiva, 29(2), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enfi.2017.12.001.
Fein, C. (2013). Multidimensional Journal Evaluation of PLOS ONE. Libri; 4(63), 259−271. https://doi.org/10.1515/libri-2013-0021.
Fuentes G, P. (2015). Revisión por pares de revistas científicas. Revista chilena de neuro-psiquiatría, 53(3), 147-148. https://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92272015000300001
Ganga-Contreras, F., Suárez-Amaya, W., Valderrama-Hidalgo, C. y Salazar-Botello, C. (2022). Rankings universitarios y su influencia en el desempeño: Comparando perspectivas expertas de Chile y Venezuela. Retos Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 12(24), pp. 200-210. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n24.2022.01.
Goyanes, M. (2020). Meta-investigación en comunicación: antecedentes, efectos y retos de una investigación y gobernanza estandarizada. Profesional de la información, 29(4), e290406. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2020.jul.06.
Haider, J., y Åström, F. (2017). Dimensions of trust in scholarly communication: Problematizing peer review in the aftermath of John Bohannon’s “Sting” in science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(2), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23669.
Handayani, I., Supriyanti, D., Maulani, G. y Lutfiani, N. (2020). The ilearning journal center: Education startup to enhance lecturer research. International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(4), 5481–5484. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/70942020.
Holcombe, A. (2019). Contributorship, Not Authorship: Use CRediT to Indicate Who Did What. Publications, 7(3), 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7030048
Huisman, J., y Smits, J. (2017). Duration and quality of the peer review process: The author’s perspective. Scientometrics, 113(1), 633–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2310-5.
Janssen, P. (2014). Historical Social Research: An International Journal for the Application of Formal Methods to History, 2004-2014. An Overview Historical Social Research Supplement, 26, 7-25. https://doi.org/10.12759/hsr.suppl.26.2014.7-25.
Karakose, T., y Demirkol, M. (2021). Exploring the emerging COVID-19 research trends and current status in the field of education: A bibliometric analysis and knowledge mapping. Educational Process: International Journal, 10(2), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2021.102.1
Kato-Vidal, E. y Hernández-Mendoza, P. (2022). Retorno social y calidad de las IES: el efecto salarial en pequeñas empresas. Retos Revista de Ciencias de la Administración y Economía, 12(24), pp. 212-228. https://doi.org/10.17163/ret.n24.2022.02.
Kim, S., Choi, H., Kim, N., Chung, E. y Lee, J. (2018). Comparative analysis of manuscript management systems for scholarly publishing, Science Editing, 5(2), 124-134. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.137.
López Arrillaga, C. E. (2023). Perspectivas y reflexiones teóricas del proceso editorial de revistas arbitradas. Revista Critica Con Ciencia, 2(3), 17–23. https://uptvallesdeltuy.com/ojs/index.php/revista_criticaconciencia/article/view/311.
Lukman, L., Dimyati, M., Rianto, Y., Subroto, I., Sutikno, T., Hidayat, D., Nadhiroh, I., Stiawan, D., Haviana, S., Heryanto, A. y Yuliansyah, H. (2018). Proposal of the S-score for measuring the performance of researchers, institutions, and journals in Indonesia. Science Editing; 5(2), 135-141. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.138.
Macias, M. (2019). El enfoque basado en proceso en la gestión editorial de las revistas científicas. Humanidades Médicas, 19(3), 637–659. https://www.medigraphic.com/pdfs/hummed/hm-2019/hm193m.pdf.
Mryglod, O., Holovatch, Y., y Mryglod, I. (2012). Editorial process in scientific journals: Analysis and modeling. Scientometrics, 91(1), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0536-1.
Nieto-Bravo, J., Pérez-Vargas, J., y Santamaría-Rodríguez, J. (2021). Desafíos a la divulgación científica del conocimiento en la actualidad. Civilizar Ciencias Sociales y Humanas, 21(40), 9–10. https://revistas.usergioarboleda.edu.co/index.php/ccsh/article/view/2176.
Nisonger, T. (2000). Use of the Journal Citation Reports for Serials Management in Research Libraries: An Investigation of the Effect of Self-Citation on Journal Rankings in Library and Information Science and Genetics. College & Research Libraries, 61(3), 263-275. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.61.3.263.
Ordoñez, Y. (2020). La importancia de buenas prácticas editoriales. ITECKNE: Innovación e Investigación en Ingeniería, 17(1), 5–6. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8573294.
Packer, A. (2014). A eclosão dos periódicos do Brasil e cenários para o seu porvir. Educação e Pesquisa, 40(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1517-97022014061860.
Piqueras, M. (2007). Aproximación histórica al mundo de la publicación científica. Quaderns de la Fundació Dr. Antoni Esteve, 1–13. https://www.esteve.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/13544.pdf.
Pontille, D., y Torny, D. (2015). From Manuscript Evaluation to Article Valuation: The Changing Technologies of Journal Peer Review. Human Studies, 38(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-014-9335-z.
Rivas Castillo, C., y Lechuga Cardozo, J. (2021). Revistas científicas. Revista veritas et scientia - upt, 10(1), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.47796/ves.v10i1.468.
Ruiz-Corbella, M., Galán, A., y Diestro, A. (2014). Las revistas científicas de Educación en España: Evolución y perspectivas de futuro. RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa, 20(2), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.7203/relieve.20.2.4361.
Sepúlveda-Vildósola, A., Abdo-Francis, J., Clark, P., Montalvo-Javé, E., y Carrillo-Esper, R. (2023). Buenas prácticas editoriales. Gaceta médica de México, 159(2), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.24875/gmm.23000073.
Sorooshian, S. (2017). Peer review art. Italian Journal of Medicine; 11, 424-425. www.doi.org/10.4081/itjm.2017.897
Sumba Nacipucha, N., Sánchez-Bayón, A., Cueva Estrada, J., & Valencia-Arias, A. (2024). Social networks as a strategy to improve the visibility of scientific journals. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2306715.
Van Eck, N., y Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.
Ventura, M., y Oliveira, S. (2022). Integridade e ética na pesquisa e na publicação científica. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 38(1), e00283521. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311x00283521.
Verma, L. (2021). OJS Security Analysis: Issues, Reasons, and Possible Solutions. Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(5), 391-396. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.41.5.15975.
Villarreal, G., y García, D. (2022). La evolución en la comunicación científica: Uso de identificadores globales y nuevos modelos de publicación anticipada. Revista ECONO. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. UNLP, 23, 25–27. https://revistas.unlp.edu.ar/econo/article/view/13102.
Vinyard, M., y Whitt, J. (2016). Scopus. The Charleston Advisor, 18(2), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.5260/chara.18.2.52.
Yañez, N., y Triveño, D. (2012). Proceso editorial de la revista científica ciencia médica: Metas cumplidas, nuevos desafíos. Revista Científica Ciencia Médica, 15(2), 3–4. http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1817-74332012000200001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elí Vicente Raudales-García , Wileidys Artigas, Benjamín Barón Velandia; Nicolás Sumba Nacipucha ; Jorge Cueva Estrada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
