Analysis of regulatory acts through the users search behavior: the case of Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica – Aneel
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2017.327Keywords:
Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica – Aneel, Google, information behavior, information retrieval, law information, representation of informationAbstract
Objective. It presents research on the analysis of normative acts issued by the Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica – Aneel from the point of view of user information. The overall objective of the research is to compare the search strategy that Aneel servers use at the time of search normative acts through the agency's search engine with search behavior in the literature in order to elicit convergences and demonstrate inconsistencies in the normative act content representation.
Method. The survey was to benchmark the work done within the Agency's Documentation Centre with treatment and representation of normative acts and their recovery by the agency's servers and sought inputs in literature on documentary analysis, legal information, Information Retrieval Systems and user search behavior information. Presents as a general method of research the study of descriptive case and used as data collection technique observation and verbal protocol thinking aloud.
Results. The results showed the user's difficulty in recovering the normative acts and the constant comparison between the search system used in Aneel, Sophia, with the Google search engine, which influences users' search behavior to make their search in the library catalog.
References
AGÊNCIAS reguladoras e reforma do estado no Brasil: inovação e continuidade no sistema político-institucional. Rio de Janeiro: Garamond, 2007.
ARAÚJO, Vera Maria Araújo Pigozzi. Sistemas de recuperação da informação: uma discussão a partir de parâmetros enunciativos. TransInformação, Campinas, 24(2):137-143, maio/ago. 2012.
ARAÚJO JÚNIOR, Rogério Henrique da. Precisão no processo de busca e recuperação da informação. Brasília: Thesaurus, 2007.
ASHER, Andrew D; DUKE, Lynda M.; WILSON, Suzanne. Paths of Discovery: Comparing the search effectiveness of EBSCO Discovery Service, Summon, Google Scholar, and conventional library resources. College & Research Libraries. v. 74, p. 464-488, september 2013. Disponível em: http://crl.acrl.org/content/early/2012/05/07/crl-374.full.pdf+html. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2015.
BAEZA-YATES, Ricardo; RIBEIRO-NETO, Berthier. Modern Information Retrieval. Nova York: ACM Press, 1999.
_____________. Recuperação de informação: conceitos e tecnologias. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2013.
BALLARD, Terry; BLAINE, Anna. User search-limiting behavior in online catalogs: Comparing classic catalog use to search behavior in next-generation catalogs. New Library World, vol.112(5/6), p.261-273, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/03074801111136293. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2015.
BARROS, Lucivaldo. Fontes de informação jurídica. In: PASSOS, Edilenice. (Org.). Informação jurídica: teoria e prática. Brasília: Thesaurus. 2004. p. 201-225.
BAXTER, Pamela; JACK, Susan. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researches. The Qualitative Report. V.15, n.4, p. 544-559, dec./ 2008. Disponível em: http://www.nova.edu/QR/QR13-4?baxter.pdf. Acesso em: 20 abr. 2015.
BOBBIO, N. Teoria do Ordenamento Jurídico. 10 ed. Brasília: Editora UnB. 1999. 184 p.
BRASIL. Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica. Resolução Normativa nº 414 de 15 de setembro de 2010. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo, Brasília, DF, 09 set. 2010. Seção 1, p. 73-76.
BRASIL. Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica. Resolução Normativa nº 63 de 13 de maio de 2004. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo, Brasília, DF, 12 maio 2004. Seção 1, p. 115-136.
BURKE, J. Discovery versus disintermediation: the new reality driven by today’s end–user. Paper presented to the VALA2010: connections, content, conversations. 15th biennial conference and exhibition, Melbourne, Victoria, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.vala.org.au/vala2010/papers2010/VALA2010_57_Burke_Final.pdf. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2015.
CARDOSO, Olinda Nogueira Paes. Recuperação de Informação. INFOCOMP: Journal of Computer Science, v. 2, n. 1, 2000. Disponível em: http://www.dcc.ufla.br/infocomp/index.php/INFOCOMP/article/view/46. Acesso em 25 nov. 2015.
CESARINO, M. A. Sistemas de recuperação da informação. Revista da Escola de Biblioteconomia da UFMG, Belo Horizonte, v.14, n.2, p.157-168, set. 1985.
CONNAWAY, L. S.; POWELL, R.R. Basic research methods for librarians.5th ed. Santa Barbara, Califórnia: Greenwood. 2010.
CRESWELL, John. W. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. 3.ed. Porto Alegre: Artimed, 2010.
CUNHA, Murilo Bastos da. Das bibliotecas convencionais às digitais: diferenças e convergências. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v. 13, n. 1, p. 2-17, jan./abr. 2008.
FAST, K. V.; CAMPBELL, D. G. I stiil like Google: University student perceptions of searching OPACs and the web. In: Proceedings of the 67th ASIS&T Annual Meeting. Anais... . v.41, p.138-146, 2004. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/meet.1450410116/pdf. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2015.
FLICK, Uwe. Uma introdução à pesquisa qualitativa.3.ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2009.
FUJITA, Mariângela Spotti Lopes. A leitura do indexador: estudo de observação. Perspect. cienc. inf., Belo Horizonte, v. 4, n. 1, p. 101 - 116, jan./jun.1999.
GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves. Formas da informação jurídica: uma contribuição para sua abordagem temática. R. bras. Biblio. e Doc., São Paulo, v. 26, n.1/2, p.41-54, jan./jun. 1993. Disponível em: http://www.brapci.ufpr.br/brapci/index.php/article/download/19240. Acesso em: 30 jul. 2015.
GRIFFITHS, J. R.; BROPHY, P. Student searching behavior and the web: use of academic resources and Google. Library Trends, Chicago, v. 53, n. 4, p. 539-554, Spring 2005. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/1749. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2015.
HARIRI, Nadjla. Relevance ranking on google: are top ranked results really considered more relevant by the users? Online Information Review, v.35(4), p.598-610, 2011.
HILDRETH, C. R. The use and understanding of keyword searching in a university online catalog. Information Technology and Libraries, v. 16, n.2, p. 52, June/1997.
JANSEN, Bernard J; SPINK, Amanda; SARACEVIC, Tefko. Real life, real users, and real needs: a study and analysis of user queries on the web. Information processing & management, v.36, n.2, p. 207-227, 2000.
KUHLTHAU, Carol. C. Inside the search process: Information seeking from the user´s perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, v. 42, n. 5, p. 361-371, 1991. Disponível em: http://faculty.washington.edu/harryb/courses/INFO310/Kuhlthau.pdf. Acesso em: 30 jul. 2015.
LACHAKE, R. S.; POTDAR, G. P. A survey on personalized search: an web Information retrieval system. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies, v. 5, n. 2, 2014, p. 1120-1127. Disponível em: http://www.ijcsit.com/docs/Volume%205/vol5issue02/removed_article%3F%3F((*)&*%5E)ijcsit2014050236.pdf. Acesso em: 01 ago. 2015.
LIMA, João Alberto de Oliveira. Modelo genérico de relacionamentos na organização da informação jurídica e legislativa. 2008, 289 f. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) - Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2008.
MELLO, Celso Antônio Bandeira de. Curso de direito administrativo. 27 ed. São Paulo: Malheiros, 2010.
MI, Jia, WENG, Cathy. Revitalizing the Library OPAC: Interface, searching, and display Challenges. Information Technology and Libraries. v.27, n.1, march. 2008.
MIRANDA, Ana Cláudia Carvalho de. A política de desenvolvimento de coleções no âmbito da informação jurídica. In: PASSOS, Edilenice. (Org.). Informação jurídica: teoria e prática. Brasília: Thesaurus. 2004. p. 137-152.
MORENO, Fernanda Passini. Em busca dos objetivos bibliográficos: um estudo sobre catálogos. 2011. 162 f., il. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) - Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2011.
NAZIM, M. Information searching behavior in the Internet age: a users’ study of Aligarh Muslim University. The International Information & Library Review, 40(1), p. 73-81, 2008. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1057231707000562. Acesso em: 25 nov. 2015.
PARK, S; LEE, J.H., BAE. End user searching: a web log analysis of NAVER, a Korean web search engine. Library of Information Science Research, 27(2), p203-221, 2005. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818805000083. Acesso em: 07 nov. 2015.
PASI, Gabriella. Issues in personalizing Information retrieval. IEEE inteligent informatics bulletin, v.11, n.1, Dec. / 2010. Disponível em: http://www.comp.hkbu.edu.hk/~iib/2010/Dec/article1/iib_vol11no1_article1.pdf. Acesso em: 10 out. 2015.
PASSOS, E. O controle da informação jurídica no Brasil: a contribuição do Senado Federal. Ciência da Informação, Brasília, v. 23, n. 3, p. 363-368, set./dez. 1994.
PAULO, Vicente; ALEXANDRINO, Marcelo. Direito constitucional descomplicado. 20 ed. São Paulo: Método, 2012.
PETRELLI, Daniela; et al. Observing users, designing clarity: a case study on user-centered design of a cross-language Information retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, v.55, n.10, p.923-934, 2004. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.20036/full. Acesso em: 06 nov. 2015.
REALE, Miguel. Lições preliminares de direito. 27. ed. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2006. 291 p.
RONDEAU, Wendy. Making use of existing tools for unknown item needs: improving subject retrieval in online catalogues. Feliciter, v. 59, Issue #4, 2013. Disponível em: http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/89745324/making-use-existing-tools-unknown-item-needs-improving-subject-retrieval-online-catalogues. Acesso em: 06 nov. 2015.
ROWLEY, Jennifer. A biblioteca eletrônica. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos, 2002.
SEKARAN, Uma. Research Methods for Business: A Skill Building Approach. 4th ed. Wiley. 2002.
SOUZA, Renato Rocha. Sistemas de recuperação de informações e mecanismos de busca na web: panorama atual e tendências. Perspect. ciênc. inf., Belo Horizonte, v.11 n.2, p. 161 -173, maio/ago. 2006. Disponível em: http://portaldeperiodicos.eci.ufmg.br/index.php/pci/article/view/320/940. Acesso em: 05 nov. 2015.
SPINK, A.; WOLFRAM, D.; JANSEN, M. B. J.; SARACEVIC, T. Searching the web: The public and their queries. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 53(2), 226-234, 2001. Acesso em: https://comminfo.rutgers.edu/~tefko/JASIST2001.pdf. Disponível em: 12 ago. 2015.
SVENONIUS, Elaine. The intelectual foundations of Information organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2000.
SWANSON, Troy A.; GREEN, Jeremy. Why we are not Google. Lessons from a library web site usability study. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 37, n. 3, p. 222–229, march 2011.
TASSO, Carlo; VENUTI, Fábio; BRAJNIK, Giorgio; MIZZARO, Stefano. Strategic help in user interfaces for information retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology, v.53, n.5, p. 614-635, 2003. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/asi.10035/full. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2016.
TAYLOR, Arlene G. The organization of information. 2. ed. Libraries Unlimited: Westport, Connecticut. 1999. 259 p.
WALLIMAN, Nicholas. Your research Project: a step-by-step guide for the first-time researcher. London: Sage Publications, 2001.
YANG, S. Q.; HOFMANN, Melissa A. The next generation library catalog: a comparative study of the OPACs of Koha, Evergreen and Voyager. Information Technology and Libraries, Vol. 29 No. 3, 2010. Disponível em: http://ejournals.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/ital/article/view/3139/2753. Acesso em: 12 ago. 2015.
YIN, Robert. K. Estudo de caso: planejamento e métodos. 2.ed. Porto Alegre: Bookman. 2001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
- Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
- The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
- Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
- The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
- Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
- The Author represents and warrants that:
- the Work is the Author’s original work;
- the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
- the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
- the Work has not previously been published;
- the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
- the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
- The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.
