The posgraduate in the librarian formational process: concepts and theoretical reflections

Authors

  • Claudia Lourenço da Silva Universidade Federal do Ceará - UFC
  • Vanildo Pereira Pontes Universidade Federal do Ceará - UFC

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2013.100

Keywords:

Librarian, Librarianship, Continuing education, Posgraduate

Abstract

Objective: To present the informational context (through concepts and theoretical reflections) on graduate school, library and librarian, as formational and educational process of the information professional. Method: its methodological process will occur in the literature review analysis (articles, books and Internet) of subjects presented through an exploratory research of the topics studied by several authors. Result: the article resulted from the perspective of understanding the continuing professional training as an important factor in the intellectual and rational development. Conclusion: The study will contribute to knowledge expansion and strengthening of professional university training courses , strict and broad sensu , as a prerequisite for librarians to qualify for structural changes of their work in the information society.

Author Biographies

Claudia Lourenço da Silva, Universidade Federal do Ceará - UFC

Bibliotecária. Possui graduação em Biblioteconomia pela Universidade Federal do Ceará (2010), atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: biblioteconomia e automação de bibliotecas.

Vanildo Pereira Pontes, Universidade Federal do Ceará - UFC

Bibliotecário na Universidade de Pernambuco, Campus Salgueiro. Possui graduação em Biblioteconomia pela Universidade Federal do Ceará (2010), atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: biblioteconomia, técnicas biblioteconômicas, automação de bibliotecas e biblioteca escolar e universitária.

Published

2015-01-09

How to Cite

Lourenço da Silva, C., & Pereira Pontes, V. (2015). The posgraduate in the librarian formational process: concepts and theoretical reflections. Biblios Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, (53), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.5195/biblios.2013.100

Issue

Section

Review